|
| | | | |
|
|
Honor, Racism, Service Rifles & "Assault Weapons": One Black Cop's View
Honor, Racism, Service Rifles & "Assault Weapons":
One Black Cop's View
By
Police Officer "Snake" Bowman
The Author "Henry 'Snake' Bowman" is obviously a "nom de-guerre" for a real person, an active
full-time, Black Police Officer whose agency prevents him from speaking his mind at risk of his employment.
"Well, you Sons of Bitches, now you know how I feel!"
-General George S. Patton-
You may not like what I'm going to say here, but the First Amendment is still in effect (at the time of the time of this writing) so I'm going to exercise my right to rant: Prepare to get your feathers ruffled!...
If you are an uniformed Police Officer of any rank and do not fully, and honorably support the pre-existing God given
rights enumerated in the 2nd Amendment, you are a disgrace to your Badge and your oath of office to protect and serve. The citizens of the United States of America deserve better than you. You should
not be allowed the honor of public service as a sworn peace officer of the law. Taking a contrary, selective position to the Constitution means you are not following the supreme law of the land and are, in fact, endangering the safety of yourself, your fellow officers, and the public you are sworn to protect. This dishonor is increased if you support any (so-called) "Police Fraternal Organization" that aligns itself with groups seeking to infringe, limit, or destroy the 2nd Amendment (Such as "Handgun Control Incorporated", etc). This dishonor is increased if you support any State or Federal Attorney General, Legislator (Politician); or local Government body that have de facto reneged on their sworn oath to "Protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign or domestic." For these individuals (by endorsing "gun control") have become the "domestic enemies" embodied in that oath.
If this description fits you, know that I consider you to have no honor and should rightly be held beneath contempt for your nauseous subservience to an unconstitutional doctrine, plus unheroic behavior in the face of danger to your fellow officers and the public.
Are you ticked off yet? Well, refer to the above quote by U.S. Army General George S
Patton. Read it? Good, that means I can only add, (if you were offended): "tough noogies"! Let's proceed...
There is plenty of documentation to
support the fact that "gun control" laws in the United States are and
have been rooted in the dishonorable practice generally known as
"Racism". If there is any doubt about this, I suggest you do some
research on your own (Author Clayton E. Cramer has written a short essay that
can bring you up to speed quickly, search it out).
This brings me to a further assertion.
I submit that if you wear the badge and happen to be of Black ancestry
("African-American" is the current "politically correct"
term: I choose not to use it), and fit the criteria I have previously described,
you should be held in special dishonor. Your ancestors fought and died
under a special adversity for the rights you presently enjoy. I know that we
still have a long way to go, (and you are unhappy with that last promotion you
were "suspiciously" beaten out of). But today you are still freer than
any previous generation, and should honor what they fought for by at least
acknowledging that fact. A Black officer or group of officers that
support "gun control" over the 2nd Amendment, in effect, support a
continuation of practices rooted in racism, practices that currently
discriminate against a targeted group of Americans not limited only to Blacks.
If you support that you have no honor and are a disgrace to your badge,
your brothers in blue, your brothers in ancestry, and the public you are sworn
to protect and serve. (This goes for the rest of you who seek not to be
identified as "Black", but are not, so-called, "white"; so
for you "others", accept that you have advanced in large part on the
corpses of millions of Black Americans who were here before you: It's a fact:
Deal with it.)
Are you ticked off yet? Are you calling me bad names? Does the truth hurt? Good,
maybe you'll grow a spine and renounce this "thing" called "gun
control" and fight for all your rights!...Refer to the Patton quote
again here.
(By the way, Patton lauded his Black tanker / tank destroyer units who fought
under his command. Patton said words to the effect of him not giving a damn what
color a man was as long as he had the balls to fight the enemy...How are yours
hangin', Lawman?)
Fact: "Gun Control" is a betrayal of the people you are sworn
to protect. "Gun Control" deprives only the law-abiding citizen the
best means of self-defense against the violent criminal element. Remember those
people? Those you are sworn to protect? And what about those "other"
people? You know them well, you have to deal with them on the street nearly
every day. You know what mindless savagery they are capable of, you have seen
the result first hand. You know they have no conscience. You know that most are
sociopathic, and rationalize that the rules don't apply to them, just the
"chumps" stupid enough to work for a living and obey "the
law" 99% of the time. You know they are cowards who enjoy harming the weak
and defenseless; who in fact take a vicious glee in the suffering of their
victims. You know there is a reason we need prisons. You know this from
"up close and personal" experience the protected rarely grasp: They
are taken aback by the naked face of evil, flee from it. They pray that you
might arrive in time to save them from it (Except, of course, from the
self-reliant gun-owning citizens "allowed" to defend themselves in
pro-self defense jurisdictions). But you , Lawman, ideally should be a
warrior/philosopher. You run toward the sound of battle, rather than from it. You
are charged with righting wrong, sworn to do so even at risk of your life. You know
the badge is more than mere metal...
That being the case, to advocate citizens offer themselves up as sheep-like
prey, to advocate the best citizens, the level-headed, able to help their
fellows in your absence, those who are your support, those whose firearms will
NEVER be turned against YOU, is unconscionable, unreasonable, and unrealistic!
That citizen could well save your life some day. It has happened in the past
countless times, what makes you think it cannot happen again? Well, it will not
happen if that citizen is (un-constitutionally) disarmed. That citizen, (in
actuality, that member of the Unorganized Militia of the United States of
America, constitutionally protected to keep and bear arms), is there to help. If
you have had to deputize a citizen while alone and struggling with a resisting
suspect, you know what I mean! (Why do you think you have the power to
deputize in the first place? Think about it, Lawman).
Understand this concept: Criminals misuse firearms in violent crime,
law-abiding citizens DON'T. The mere fact that one is willing to misuse a
firearm against his fellows automatically brands them an evildoer, unfit to
share the company of non-violent citizens: Their intent and action (Human
responsible agency) defines them as violent criminals, mere possession of
firearms does not. Never confuse the two...Remember there is a faction whose
intent is specifically designed to deceive you into equating mere possession of
firearms with evil intent: Never fall for this sophistical gambit, don't be a
gullible fool, manipulated by emotionalist propaganda. Use your mind and logic
to see through the hype
To advocate this "thing", this "gun control", is the highest
betrayal of the primary rule of nature: self-defense. It is a cruel betrayal of
the people you are sworn to protect, and a boon to the evildoers among us. It is
the ultimate betrayal of your hard-earned Badge and all it stands for...
Are you ticked off yet? Are you calling me "crazy" because you have
been fed propaganda claiming citizens "can't be trusted with guns"?
Has it occurred to you that all citizens are not violent criminals? that
"cause and effect" do not support the flawed theory that armed
citizens cause crime?, that it is illogical to "tar the citizen with the
same brush" as the violent predators among us?
Well, know this: the advocates of this despicable thing called "gun
control" do not bother to make these distinctions! Their mentality proves
it, and the intentional criminalization of millions of American citizens at
their hands, through the "banning" of mythical so-called "Assault
Weapons", handguns, and other infringements, proves that "crime
control", despite their claims, is not their true agenda.
After all, why would politicians intentionally create a new class of
"criminals" from a population that has not engaged in any
violent acts? In some jurisdictions, California comes to mind, Police Officers,
assumed to be trusted to carry firearms in the defense of the public; are not
exempted from these "assault weapons" bans, on or off-duty. Think
about that, Lawman, What message is that sending you? . What about "Officer
Safety"? (Particularly in the wake of the North Hollywood shootout, where
Cops had to go begging to local gun shops to borrow "illegal assault
weapons" to stop terrorist bank robbers?). They are denying you safety, and
survival, and by extension, also the public.
How are you being seen by those who seek to ban any firearms that
can be demonized to suit arbitrary political whims, such as
"(Niggertown) Saturday Night Specials", ".50 Caliber Sniper
Rifles", or the current obfuscation craze, the alleged "deadly, high
powered semi-automatic weapon" aka "Assault Weapons"? (President
"Teddy" Roosevelt would have been confused about that one: He
routinely carried "semi-autos" on his hunts, and this was in the early
19th Century! "Semi-Auto" Technology is nothing "new",
despite newsroom propaganda).
Realize that even you are now a suspect, viewed as a "latent
criminal" by the very people that claim to be "pro-law
enforcement", and tell the public that you support their views! This
concept is what the Communists called "useful idiots", human tools to
further a totalitarian agenda. If you think they are your
"friends", I beg you to look at the facts and realize that anyone
who seeks to deny your self-preservation is not your friend! Period!
Anyone who seeks to deny American citizens the ability for self-preservation
is not a friend either: The two go hand in hand: the protectors and those they
are charged to protect...And over what? Simple possession of a legally
purchased firearm that is no different from any other of its class except by
it's "appearance"?
Orchestrated brainwash: Propaganda techniques and The Mythical "Assault
Weapon"
Anyone but an abject moron or gullible dupe can deny certain obvious facts
regarding firearms. . Several well-researched articles have been written
supporting the facts about "semi-automatic" firearms. For brevity, I
will assert 2 basic facts important to understand when attempting to figure out
how we got to this point in history.
Fact 1) Propaganda techniques developed by the Nazis and Communists are not
dead: It is easy for one to dismiss facts by claiming a "right
wing" bias against "progressive" (Socialist) ideas. That's a game
for fools. Advocates of "gun control" unashamedly use emotionalistic
ploys a to gather cash, sympathy, and "useful idiots", to further
their agenda. Accept that these people are more than willing to LIE without
conscience to further their agenda. Have no illusions about it. Furthermore....
Fact-2) The "Mainstream Media" and University environments are
controlled by Socialist "political correctness": One cannot rely
upon these sources, in the main, to be objective or
"pro-constitution". The "Lamestream Media" are the epitome
of "useful idiots". Their news organs are run by 60's Marxist
influenced cadre who use our "freedom of speech" against us (As
predicted by Soviet Cold Warrior Nikita "We will bury you" and
"We will take over your society without firing a shot", Kruschev).
University "Professors" happily brainwash your kids with
discredited Marxist rhetoric...They "love" the 1st Amendment, but see
the rest of the Constitution as merely a hindrance to be negated as soon as
possible, particularly the 2nd Amendment. As elite "intellectuals"
they ignore the fact that they would be first against the firing squad wall in
the Utopian "revolution" they dream of.
(In the Congo revolution of the 1960's, people were shot out of hand merely for
having the intellect to ride a bicycle!) Both elements are anti-firearms (in the
hands of the untrustworthy "masses" at least) by philosophy.
Ironically their "supporters" would quickly "put them against the
wall" after they are no longer "useful idiots". These fools would
graduate to being "dead idiots" and initiators of a Police state,
rather than a "Utopia". This has happened countless times in history,
yet they never accept this fact.
Summary: "Gun Control" advocates consistently use the above indicated
techniques, are shameless liars, and have no compunction to use "any means
necessary" to disarm Americans...They are in fact elitists who look
down on the "masses" being armed and care nothing for your safety.
They hate the Police as "tools of the oppressors" (i.e.: not under
their control), and all they stand for. They "tolerate" guns only to
assure their self-preservation (Your self-preservation does not count,
they see you only as fit to be nameless victims on TV news bytes. This applies
to both Police and citizens!)
Lies and dammed lies: The Mythical "Assault Weapon"
If you have stuck with me this far, it likely means you know something about
firearms so I can cut to the chase and get down to business. Keeping the
previous facts in mind, other facts appear that we already know, such
as...
There is no honor in dishonor: We are not "useful idiots",
cowardly by nature and easily manipulated by fear tactics. We know that a cruel
"magic trick" has been cynically perpetrated on the people of the USA,
and continues to be at the time of this writing. We know that the politicians,
their "running dogs" (to borrow a Communist propaganda term) in the
news media, and, sadly, the "useful idiots" who carry a badge and
align themselves with these elements for personal gain and power. These are
primarily Police Chiefs/Sheriffs and "Fraternal Organizations", who
claim to represent the true street cops, but have long ago lost touch with the
street and the officers who daily are on the line.
These dishonorable individuals are a disgrace to the Badge for their
craven contempt of officer and civilian safety by condoning firearm
confiscation, this "thing" called "gun control"). We know
this axis are liars, dammed liars, and continue to be liars!. We know, however,
that they have had success with their dammed lies! Fact:
There is no such thing as an "Assault Weapon": We know that the
firearms that have been demonized as so-called "Assault Weapons" are
no more dangerous than any other common rifle. We know that these firearms
were discriminated against simply because they look similar to current
military firearms. We know that looks are totally irrelevant to function.
We know that many of these targeted firearms are in fact less lethal than most
common firearms, because the ammunition is of lower power. We know that the
propagandists misused the German term "Strumgewer" ("Assault
Rifle"), a firearm by definition a "machine gun" or
"full-automatic" rifle, and bastardized the term into "Assault
Weapon". Then, using the "Big Lie" technique (itself pioneered by
Nazi master propagandist Josef Goebbels) by substituting the term "Assault
Weapon" for "semi-automatic" or "self-loading" rifles.
The latest definitional "bait and switch" buzzword is to refer to any
self-loading firearms, rifle or pistol, as so-called scary "Semi-Automatic
weapons". This latest variation on the theme serves the same purpose as the
original: Create confusion and reactionary fear in the populace to further a
gun confiscation agenda, plus stigmatize any law-abiding citizen who would
choose to own such a military look alike firearm! The idea is to discredit
the gun owner, force them to appear to be "unreasonable", and thereby
justify "more reasonable controls" on firearms.
Remember their overused talking point?
"Why would anyone need an "assault weapon"? (A lawyer must have
thought up that bit of "are you still beating your wife" rhetoric!).
This "Divide and Conquer" tactic worked quite well, and all gun owners
who fell into that trap should be ashamed of themselves. From the black powder
shooters up and through the .50 Cal Geeks, we should never again allow
ourselves to be divided this way!. If you remember nothing from this essay,
remember this point!).
After all, one can buy a 150mph capable Ferrari, but only "needs" a VW
Bug: Quick! Justify that argument to yourself right now. What other logical
arguments should you have come up with when some brainwashed anti gun do-gooder
got in your face with this type of propaganda?...How will you fare in similar
situations in future?.
Military look-alikes are "more" Constitutionally protected than
others: They are true "Militia Rifles!
This fact points to the actual reason why these firearms are demonized
and "banned"!. Did it ever occur to you, Lawman, why the anti-gun
fanatics chose to "ban" these mythical firearms rather than seek to
"control" them by using the same system already in place for
"machine guns"? Think about it...Hard!. Scenarios can range from
the simple (Semi-Auto technology could not stand the objective test to compare
them to actual machineguns, therefore the gun-banners had to consider they might
lose using such a tactic) to the full-on "nightmare" (Gun banning
politicians looking outside their office windows to see thousands of citizens of
all races and creeds gathered together, each thrusting their AR-15's, AK-47's
and FAL rifles overhead, chanting in unison "Don't tread on me!",
"Never Again!" and "fill in the blank!"). [What scenario(s)
do you think explains "banning" vs. "control"?]...
The modern Militia Rifle is no different from the personally supplied musket,
powder and ball of our ancestors: state of the art civilian versions of
military firearms, as the founding fathers intended. The Swiss have long
known this simple concept, and their unorganized Militia possesses government
issued (actual) Assault Rifles and other small arms in most homes. Their
politicians appear to have no problem trusting the people with arms. Here, in
the USA, politicians intentionally conspire to deprive the people of arms,
and have specifically targeted those arms that have the most utility as Militia
firearms. Can we see the forest for the trees? I'm going to say it, because
is seems nobody else has the "stones" to "tell it like it
is", so prepare again to get your feathers ruffled! Our first and best
President, George Washington, hit the nail on the head when he called Militia
Rifles our "liberty teeth"!
Do you really think the gun-ban fanatics don't know the real significance
of widespread ownership of Militia Rifles? Do you really think they suddenly
decided that these firearms should be "banned" because a few isolated
madmen (criminals) decided to commit "suicide by Cop", turning the gun
on their fellows, with the resultant, orchestrated, high profile media coverage?
(A tactic used to "justify" gun bans in Canada, Australia, and the
U.K. to name a few...Countries who now have a nearly out of control
"illegal firearms" crime rates? Don't forget that their governments declared
the firearms to be illegal in the first place, yet decry so-called
"illegal firearms use"). George Washington had recent memory of the
events that sparked the Revolutionary War against the Crown, events that are not
taught to our children, glossed over, or outright lied about in classrooms all
over the USA. The simple fact is that the revolt was sparked by British
troops attempting to confiscate the arms and ammunition of American colonists!
Our ancestors called those that would deprive the people of arms as tyrants
seeking to crush liberty. So I ask you, what are we to call those who
seek to do the same thing here and now?. Remember what I said about
those who would deprive you of your right to defend yourself not being your
friends, Lawman? What about your officer safety and the safety of those you are
sworn to protect? (One cannot "pursue happiness" if one is dead,
after all). What do we call those who today are relentlessly determined to
confiscate, declare "illegal", and "ban" firearms,
particularly those most suited to be Americans "liberty teeth"?
Those who are doing the same thing as those British troops of yore, (by
"legal" means): attempting to confiscate the arms and ammunition
of Americans? Say it, Dammit!
The bottom line: Telling it like it is, and Deal with it!
The constant spiteful attacks, slander, demonization and ridicule of law-abiding
gun owners over the years are taking their toll. The peaceful citizens of the
"gun culture" are fast reaching their limit of how much abuse they are
going to take. They are fed up with being compared to violent criminals, because
they know they are not.
They rightly resent, and are fearful of being turned into "instant
felons", merely because a firearm has some innocuous feature they know has
no realistic bearing on its function. These execrable "laws" are
already on the books, and the citizens, terrorized by State propaganda, know
they are in jeopardy, backed into a corner. You know what happens when you have
to deal with the proverbial "cornered animal"? And realize this:
No politician will suffer because of these "laws", if anything, they
will exploit the results of the "enforcement" of these
"laws", and what will that be, Lawman? You or your fellows being
killed by the dozens attempting to serve warrants on "technical
violators" (that guy with a "flashhider", "detachable
magazine" or "bayonet lug" on his legally bought firearm? All
because some cowardly "Supervisor" thought it would be an "easy
arrest", as the "violator" is not a known violent felon? That
is the bottom line: You have been put in the "trick bag", Lawman! They
pass the phony unconstitutional "gun laws", but you, Lawman,
are the first to DIE "enforcing" them!
These citizens are not stupid, they instinctively know these "laws"
are wrong. You know that these laws are wrong also, Lawman, and what you see
on the street every workday proves it over and over again. I know because I see
it every workday myself. Again, I say: Criminals misuse firearms in violent
crime; law-abiding citizens do not! I have never seen or heard of anyone
injured or killed by a "folding stock" or a "30 round
magazine". I have seen people injured by the "human responsible
agency" of another person, using "weapons" from fist to
automobile.
By standing against the lie embodied in this unnatural anti-self defense
concept of "gun control", you are making the ultimate statement to
truth, justice, integrity and honor. You are assuring that the Police in America
will not go down the same path as the Politzei of the Nazi era, passively
participating in the oppression of those citizens disfavored by the current
government. (James Madison: "Americans [having] the right and
advantage of being armed-unlike citizens of other countries whose governments
are afraid to trust the people with arms").
We are Americans our traditions make us unique. We must, as officers of
the law, protect and serve the citizenry, enabling them to "pursue
happiness" as best possible. Your Badge should only reflect the bright
light of liberty and never embrace the dark side of evil: the
poisonous, insidious, despicable, doctrine of gun confiscation. There is no
higher evil than to deprive the citizens of the United States their right to
individual, collective, and national defense against those who would harm them
without mercy. Stand against this horrific crime. Prevent the consequences,
intentional or not.. The gun-confiscators are creating a move from "the
ballot box to the cartridge box". Only your sacred Badge and all it stands
for will prevent it, and this you have sworn to do Lawman!
Well, you Sons of Bitches really know how I feel now!
Officer "Henry 'Snake' Bowman"
Things to do: Action Items
Join GOA/NRA: & Stay informed
I prefer the "no compromise"
stance of Gun Owners of America to the present stance of the NRA , although I
think one should belong to both. NRA members should not be shy about their
disagreeing with the Quisling-like mantra to "enforce existing laws",
rather than "repeal existing laws". NRA must return to the true
path and realize there is another way. If we keep to the Constitutional
"high road", we will keep the focus on the goal &
avoid the "divide and conquer" strategy employed by the anti-firearms
civil rights fanatics.
(NRA must re-evaluate supporting programs such as "Project Exile",
a good program in theory, but prone to abuse in the real world)
(The first non-violent citizen arrested for a mere technical violation,
previously declared to be a "felony" under some half-baked sinister
"gun ban", will prove the truth of what I'm saying. No one
should go to prison simply for having such ordinary features as a folding
stock, detachable magazine, or bayonet lug, etc on their firearm.!. I submit
that anyone arrested under these conditions are far from "common
criminals" but are in fact "political prisoners", with all the
rights springing from such a status... After all when was the last time you
heard of a group of "gang-bangers", Physical cowards who attack
from moving vehicles, having the gonads to mount a bayonet charge against
their opposition? A silly image? No more silly than "banning" a
firearm simply because it has a bayonet lug.
Network with fellow pro-rights supporters, Both Law Enforcement and responsible
civilians:
Remember, WE are the largest
multi-racial "minority group" in the USA and suffer naked
discrimination because of it. We are Lawful Gun Owners and should be proud of
it. No more of this division by our firearms preferences or by accident of
birth! If they go after the rifles, the handgun owners, skeet shooters, National
Match shooters, etc should rightly consider that as an attack on them and
their preference: It's the same "civil rights violation" no matter the
type of firearm!. Despite being disparaged as "unreasonable
gun-nuts", we are the last bastion of liberty, and those seeking to
confiscate firearms know this fact!
(Note that I said "responsible
civilians", which equal the unorganized Militia of the United States of
America. This "non-select" Militia is by definition inclusive
requiring all able-bodied individuals capable of bearing arms for
defense. "Race, creed, color" is irrelevant, Patriotic loyalty is not).
There will be those who won't like that definition and will quote the
"Militia Act of 1792" and such to refute it, but I assert what I have
outlined carries the spirit and intent of the founding fathers. "Who
are the militia? They consist of the whole people," said Patrick
Henry)...
Above all, retain the honor and integrity of the Badge:
I know you work for a living, have
bills to take care of and other commitments. As a Lawman, you must do your level
best to stop those that are pushing this dangerous doctrine of gun confiscation.
Our duty is to keep the peace for the law-abiding citizens. Gun
confiscation will destroy that potential peace, which is already gone too far
due to these bad laws. It can only result in destruction of liberty and the rise
of a totalitarian Police state. Forbid it, by God, never here!
God Bless America!
Citations and Resources: a short list
-
"Assault Weapons", See
pg. 52-60 in "Guns Crime and Freedom" by Wayne LaPierre ; ISBN
0-06-097674-8; Harper Collins Publishers Inc., 10 East 53rd St, NY, NY,
10022; 1995
-
Assault
Weapons by Clyde Spencer
-
Assault
Weapons by Hugh Downs (Emeritus ABC News Broadcaster)
-
Racism
& Gun Control
-
The
Racist Roots of Gun Control by Clayton E. Cramer
-
"Before the Mayflower"
by Lerone Bennett Jr. -Penguin Books Inc., 7110 Ambassador Rd., Baltimore,
Maryland, 21207 USA (Though leftist in tone, this book has invaluable info
on Blacks in the early Militia of the Revolutionary and Civil Wars, and the
anti-gun "Black Codes.") The basis of today's discrimination
against all American gun owners: Knowledge is power, Kids'!
-
Racist
Gun Control Laws by Geoff Metcalf
Organizations
Cop-Specific Organizations
-
2nd Amendment Police Department: www.2ampd.net
-
Law Enforcement Alliance of
America: www.leaa.org (Decide for
yourself)
-
Law Enforcement for the
preservation of the 2nd Amendment: www.lepsa.org
(Decide for yourself)
Commentators
Read the opinions of pro-gun police officers from around the world at:
|
|
|
