Seattle PI Gun Show Editorial
 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:56:33 
  -0800 (PST)
  From: robert n lyman <rlyman@u.washington.edu>
  To: editpage@seattlep-i.com
  Subject: Gun show editorial
The best thing I can say about your 
  editorial in favor of gun-show background checks is that it wasn't quite as 
  misinformed and sensational as that published in the Seattle Times last week. 
  But it was close. Some points you ignored:
 
  1) According to the DOJ, guns from gun shows 
    make up fewer than 2% of all guns used in crimes. Since nobody knows if those 
    guns were purchased at licensed dealers or not, nobody knows if the law your 
    editorial pushes will have any effect. It IS known that between 98% and 100% 
    of crime guns will NOT be affected by this law.
  2) The Brady bill has had no measurable impact 
    on crime. The highly biased antigun researchers Jens Ludwig and Philip Cook 
    were unable to cook the books enough to produce any statistical evidence that 
    background checks reduce crime. Read all about it at http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v284n5/abs/joc91749.html. 
    Or just read this quote: "...[I]mplementation of the Brady Act appears 
    to have been associated with reductions in the firearm suicide rate for persons 
    aged 55 years or older but not with reductions in homicide rates or overall 
    suicide rates." That is hardly a ringing endorsement, especially for 
    a bill which was so heavily hyped at the time.
  3) The elephant in the newsroom isn't just 
    sitting there; it is crashing about breaking things. Criminals don't shop 
    at your local gun store or gun show. Criminals steal their guns or buy them 
    on the black market. Vague promises of "making it more difficult for 
    criminals" notwithstanding, regulations imposed on the legal market have 
    NO EFFECT on people who are willing to break the law. As long as drugs and 
    illegal immigrants find their way to Seattle, so will illegal guns, whether 
    smuggled, stolen, or illegally manufactured. Cracking down on antique collectors 
    at gun shows won't prevent crime any more than banning the sale of aspirin 
    will prevent addiction to cocaine. Rite Aid and gun shows serve different 
    markets than underworld drug and gun runners. This is so obvious (and so thoroughly 
    confirmed by criminologists), I have to imagine that your editors and Ceasefire 
    are intentionally ignoring it in pursuit of your ideology. 
Get off the backs of law-abiding gun owners in 
  Washington. We aren't doing anything wrong and are getting sick of PC persecution.
Robert Lyman
  
  Seattle, 98117
To Get Your Letters Printed Here
Click here and read submission guidelines.