|
| | | | |
|
|
Times Change, But Gun Control
Remains the Same
By Joseph
Pickett
June 15, 2003
KeepAndBearArms.com -- If I could have a dollar for every time an anti-gun,
scum-sucking lie has been casually tossed into a news story and treated as
reality, I wouldn't be sitting in this gray cubicle. No, I'd probably be lying
on a sun-soaked beach somewhere well South, composing a story on a laptop when
the urge infrequently struck, rather than my current write-or-starve motivation.
I think there would be a frilly drink garnished with a purple umbrella in the
sunny picture as well. Oh, and grilled lobster tails.
Haven't heard any lies? Sure you have. The lies have been spouted by sunny Katie
on The Today Show, in AP wire stories under many names, and by Dan in the
evening, repeated until they are accepted as truth. For example: 'Assault
weapons are criminals' weapon of choice' (Assault weapons were used in less than
2% of crimes involving firearms before the enactment of any state or national
assault weapons ban.) Or how about '13 children are killed by guns each day.'
(True, but only if you count people up to 19 or 24 years-old as children,
depending on the study). The gun-grabbers use these lies to push public
acceptance of a variety of useless gun control laws, such as the 'assault
weapons' ban.
Outrageous, but ho-hum, nothing new here. Attempts to restrict the gun freedoms
of Americans have been ongoing for centuries. In fact, a close look at the
history of gun control in the United States reveals that removing guns from the
hands of citizens has often been used as an underhanded method for elites to
remove power from the people.
This is precisely what occurred in the state of Maryland in the 1700's and
1800's. What was different, however, was that the disarmament strategy of the
wealthy planters in charge focused on a particular group of people, not all
Americans. Within a few decades of the state's founding in 1631, the numerous
tobacco plantations that sprung up required a lot of manpower to work them.
Enter black slaves from Africa. As the nature of man dictates that he would
prefer living in freedom rather than in leg irons, a nasty slave rebellion was
always a possibility. And a nasty slave rebellion could grow far nastier if
slaves had access to firearms. The wealthy planters in charge were aware of
this, so the colonial assembly (consisting largely of slave owners) passed the
first gun control law in Maryland that severely punished any black person who
had a gun in his or her possession.
Chapter XLIV, Section XXXII of the Acts of 1715 stated:
"That no negro or other slave within this province shall be permitted to carry
any gun, or any other offensive weapon, from off their master's land, without
license from their said master; and if any negro or other slave shall presume to
do so, he shall be liable to be carried before a justice of the peace, and be
whipped, and his gun or other offensive weapon shall be forfeited to him that
shall seize the same and carry such negro so offending before a justice of the
peace."
Such efforts to disarm blacks continued after the Union victory in the Civil
War. The Union's victory was due, in no small part, to the efforts of
approximately 180,000 to 200,000 blacks who had served in the Union Army and
comprised about 10 percent of the grand total. They were now free and trained in
the use of arms. Former slave owners were a bit leery of running into one of
their former slaves on the street, familiar with the use of arms and packing
heat. Southern whites also realized that it would be far easier to discourage
blacks from acting upon the "notions of a freeman" if they were unarmed and had
no effective means to resist intimidation by their former masters.
Due to these unpleasant possibilities, Maryland adopted a new constitution after
the war. A major sticking point during debate was the right to bear arms as it
related to blacks. During the constitutional convention of 1867, the right to
keep and bear arms was debated in the form of an amendment to what is now
Article 28 to Maryland Declaration of Rights. Many delegates to that convention,
who were either former slave owners or had served as officers in the Confederate
army, were not about to guarantee the right of freed blacks to own guns.
According to Debates of the Maryland Constitutional Convention of 1867, 150-51:
Article 28 was read as follows: "That a well regulated militia is the proper and
natural defense of a free government."
Mr. Giddings moved to amend by adding after the word "government" the words,
"and every citizen has the right to bear arms in defense of himself and the
state."
Mr. Garey moved to amend the amendment by inserting the word "white" after the
word "every".
Mr. Giddings' amendment failed, but it was white fear over free blacks owning
guns was the critical factor in defeating the adoption of a right to keep and
bear arms in Maryland's Constitution of 1867.
Of course, the above gun control examples of the past have nasty racist
overtones that the current movement lacks. But say this for the gun grabbers
back then: They were honest in their intentions. These folks were terrified of
guns being in the 'wrong' hands (people of color), so they did all they could to
prevent it.
In the 21st century, on the other hand, anti-gunners are extremely dishonest
about their intentions. They use distortions and lies and shady policy to foist
their agenda upon unsuspecting Americans under the guise of 'public safety' and
'national security.' Plus, they have much bigger aims than their ancestors - now
they want to disarm not just blacks, but all law-abiding Americans. Well, at
least that's one honest achievement for the Violence Policy Center and the
Million Mom March - they've taken the racism out of gun confiscation.
How progressive of them.
|
|
|
