This article was printed from KeepAndBearArms.com.
For more gun- and freedom-related information, visit
http://www.KeepAndBearArms.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------
|
Reply to
Hillary Clinton's Request for Campaign Support Originally published on this website July 17, 2000 The Smartest Woman In The World recently sent an appeal for funds to my wife.
This is the letter we composed in response. I'm sure many of you share our
sentiments... July 12, 2000 Dear Hillary, As a citizen of the State of New York, I, too, am very concerned about the
direction in which this state, and in fact this country, appears to be headed.
Therefore, I am prepared to make a generous contribution in support of the
candidate who shares my deep commitment to both my values and my concerns
regarding the future of our nation and the lives of our children. Our children represent our future. Nothing is more important than ensuring
that they are able to grow up protected and safe from harm. Judging by the way
you've spent the past 30 years "working to make a difference in the lives
of children and their families" by advancing the idea that the mass
slaughter of babies in the womb is an acceptable option among supposedly
civilized people, however, I can clearly see that you have no love or concern
for children whatsoever. While you resort to mass hysteria, remorseless
demagoguery and outright lies to advance your disarmament agenda under the
banner of "the safety of our children," you promote a disregard for
human life that has resulted in the needless deaths of tens of millions of the
most vulnerable and innocent of "our children." Even if your "12
children a day die from gun violence" figure was true (it's not--this
misleading statistic includes suicides, violence by gang members and criminals
shot by police, and also includes as "children" all persons up until
the age of twenty-one), that number, while tragic, would still pale in
comparison to the utter butchery and carnage committed daily in abortion
"clinics" nationwide. You defend a woman's right to "choose" to murder her own flesh and
blood, but seek to take away a woman's right to "choose" to defend
herself in life-threatening situations against an assailant that is undoubtedly
bigger and stronger than she is, an attitude reminiscent of the old misogynistic
rape advice, "just lay back and enjoy it." Obviously, not only do you
hate children, but you hate women, too. When you refer to enacting "sensible" gun laws, you are admitting
that the 20,000 existing anti-gun laws are something less than sensible. I
agree. Laws that infringe on a God-given right which is guaranteed by the
Constitution of the United States, and only affect lawful gun owners, can in no
way be called sensible. Adding to the already bloated number of unconstitutional
laws already on the books will do nothing to deter criminals who, by definition
of the word, do not obey any laws. While I recognize the obligation of gun
owners to properly educate themselves regarding safety, and the necessity of
justly punishing those irresponsible people whose failure to safely secure and
store their firearms results in needless tragedy, I still submit that our
children are far safer in a world in which law-abiding citizens have the ability
to protect themselves from criminals. In fact, numerous studies have clearly
shown that more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens actually serve to
deter and decrease the incidence of crime, rather than increase it. In a way, I can see why you so strongly support the disarmament of American
citizens, particularly women: Had any one of the growing number of victims
sexually assaulted by your husband been armed with a self-defense weapon, you
would likely now be a widow, thereby deprived of your vehicle of opportunity to
seize power and advance your socialist agenda. By discarding the Constitution
and imposing draconian "gun control," you can help to ensure that Bill
will not wind up on the wrong end of a .38 Special during some future dalliance. You claim to seek "tolerance," while what you actually demand is
unquestioned, politically-correct acceptance of perverted and immoral lifestyle
choices. Those who do not view such deviant behavior as normal and nourishing
are branded by you as "bigoted" and "mean-spirited," and the
expression of any viewpoint which dares to contradict yours is labeled as
"hate speech." You ask for tolerance, but hypocritically tolerate no
beliefs other than your own. While I will certainly tolerate those among us who,
for whatever reason, choose perversion over normalcy, I cannot
"accept" such behavior as natural, nor do I want it presented to my
children as such. Perversion is perversion, no matter how you package it or
attempt to present it. Your claim that school vouchers "undermine" public education is
laughable. Nothing has undermined education in this country more than the OBE
programs trumpeted by the NEA and similar socialist organizations. Public
schools today are nothing more than government-run "indoctrination
centers" which brainwash our children with a curriculum of revisionist
history, globalist propaganda and pornographic sex education. The ideas of
Patriotism and Nationalism are regarded as anachronisms of some bygone era, as
is the notion that the family unit should consist of a father, mother and
children. Competition between students is discouraged, so as not to
"damage" someone's fragile self-esteem. Virtue, modesty and morality?
Ideas from the past. Children are being programmed for promiscuity. Rather than
stress abstinence as the "birth control" that works every time, our
children are given instruction in the use of condoms. Discussions on variations
of sexual behavior are becoming common occurrences in even the lower grades. You
promote and condone this obscenity, and still feign concern for our children's
best interests? How dare you! There is, of course, a bigger picture. The "dumbing-down" of
America, along with the disarmament of its citizens, are essential parts of the
ongoing realization of the globalist agenda, the so-called New World Order, in
which both you and your husband are not only major promoters, but key players.
The result will be the loss of our sovereignty, and the destruction of America
as we know it. The implementation of your leftist, socialist policies will only
hasten this destruction. As a proud American citizen, I choose not to let that
happen. Therefore, since we share no common values or concerns, I cannot and will not
contribute to your campaign, and will "fight my heart out" to see that
you and those with similar designs are never elected to public office. Kindly
remove my name from your mailing list. Sincerely, A Concerned American Mom P.S. I had fully intended to sign my name, but in order to avoid a
"coincidental" IRS audit, or to avoid possibly becoming the latest
"suicidal" addition to the "Clinton Body Count," I prudently
decided to sent this anonymously. Thank you for To Get Your Letters Printed Here |
||||||||