|
| | | | |
|
|
A Bridge to the Second
Amendment
September 25, 2001
How do we win?
In recent years, the gun rights movement has suffered numerous setbacks as state
governments and the Federal government have passed legislation designed to
restrict the rights of gun owners. There have been some major victories as well.
These include nearly unanimous court rulings in favor of gun manufacturers,
expansion of "shall issue" concealed carry laws in various states, and
the advent of the Bush administration. (Although Bush's record on guns isn't
perfect, an Al Gore administration would have been disastrous to gun owners.)
Two camps have formed in the battle over guns--those who favor further
restrictions or even confiscation of all firearms versus those who believe that
law-abiding citizens have a natural and Constitutional right to own guns.
The majority of Americans are somewhere in between. Many citizens favor gun
registration and further legal restrictions on firearms--however, these same
Americans believe that law-abiding Americans should have the right to own guns
and that the punishment of criminals is more important than new gun laws. It's a
delicate balance beam that we must walk to convince these folks that further
restrictions will result in eventual loss of all gun rights.
The national news media is not on our side. Recent studies have shown that most
stories reported by national news organizations are slanted against gun owners
(for more information on these studies check out Accuracy in Media's website, or
visit http://www.KeepAndBearArms.com/Media_Bias).
In the face of this blackout of pro-gun viewpoints, how do we win?
Our major winning issue is armed self-defense. Strategies for victory should be
based around this issue.
Defensive shootings occur every day. These stories are carried almost
exclusively in the "local" or "state" section of newspapers.
(Papers usually only report shootings in which someone was injured or
killed--therefore, the great majority of armed self-defense stories are never
even reported.) After each new shooting of a burglar or robber or rapist,
letters to the editors overwhelmingly tend to favor the citizen who defends
himself or herself. Many times after such a shooting, the local paper will run a
poll asking readers their opinion on armed self-defense. Public response is
always heavily in favor of the citizen who defended himself or herself.
Self-defense is the only issue that that I'm aware of that can combat the
emotion-driven anti-gun rhetoric. Most citizens can envision a situation in
which they or a loved one are attacked by criminals and the only means of
self-protection is a firearm. The average John or Jane Doe understands that no
matter how effective a local police force is, officers are rarely available when
an attack or robbery or rape occurs. It is for this reason that armed
self-defense stories are so important. Anti-gunners are aware of the power these
stories have and will do everything they can to censor them.
Using the above-stated beliefs as a springboard for discussion, I'd like to
offer some specific steps that we as individuals and existing pro-gun
organizations must take to win.
(1) Support gun rights organizations.
This is rather obvious, but crucial to our success. There are many groups with
important missions that need our support. Each of us should select an
organization and give of our time and financial resources.
The advent of the internet has provided a world-wide forum for the Second
Amendment. One of the most effective and visionary internet groups is KeepAndBearArms.com,
affectionately referred to as KABA. This organization is currently in the
process of archiving thousands of self-defense stories which will be made
available to researchers free of charge. Angel Shamaya, Director of the organization,
co-founded Operation Self-Defense, a group of internet detectives who scour
newspapers each day for stories of armed self-defense. Another excellent
internet site is TheFiringLine.com
which provides a series of forums/message boards for those who wish to be in
contact with other firearms enthusiasts. These are just two of the many
excellent pro-gun websites found on the internet.
Gun rights advocates who are financially capable should pick at least one
organization and donate whatever resources they can. If you don't have monetary
funds available to you, volunteer your time. For example, the above-mentioned
Operation Self-Defense can help you put a small amount of time within the
framework of a national program. (Visit the website at http://www.KeepAndBearArms.com/OpSD.)
(2) We must establish a self-defense
foundation.
This would be a private, non-profit organization with the capacity of raising
large amounts of money to be used in meeting its objectives. The Self-Defense
Foundation (as I will call it for our purposes) would have two primary
objectives: first, publicizing self-defense issues; and second, providing a
support system for victims who survived violent attacks by using a firearm.
(a) Publicizing self-defense issues.
Since we know the national media will not voluntarily carry these stories, we
must force them to do so. Here are a few ideas as to how we can pressure them
into doing that.
* Victim's speaker's tour.
Attractive victims (sorry, but that's what the media is looking for) who use
guns to survive violent attacks should be trained in the art of communication by
the Foundation and should be sent on an annual speaker's tour, much as a group
of prize-winning authors might go on tour. Victims should stop in various
cities, with advance publicity, rallying gun rights advocates to the cause and
generating media attention. Most local media will carry such stories. Since
local television stations are generally affiliates of major networks, the word
will quickly filter up to ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX News, etc. If the anti-gunners
organize counter demonstrations, the stage is set for major media coverage.
* Recognition of victims who survived.
Each year, awards should be given to a select group of these victims, and the
press should be invited. While other pro-gun organizations occasionally
recognize victims, this should be a high-level, publicity-driven annual event.
Expert publicists should be hired by the Foundation to make sure the major media
is aware of and covers these awards ceremonies.
* Provide speakers to appear on radio and television.
With the advent of cable news shows, more spots are available for pro-gun
interviewees. Also, with the success of FOX News, I've noticed that CNN, MSNBC,
and other news organizations are beginning to invite more conservatives on their
news shows and to treat them with respect. The Foundation should be located in a
major media center (New York, Los Angeles, or Washington, D. C.) and should
develop positive working relationships with all media personnel.
(b) Providing support systems for victims who survived violent attacks.
I have interviewed approximately 50 people who met the enemy face-to-face and
won. One of the little-known secrets is that in the majority of cases, these
confrontations leave life-long, sometimes debilitating scars: financial burdens,
psychological dysfunctions (such as post traumatic stress syndrome) and problems
relating to physical injuries suffered in such attacks. For every victim who
says that shooting a perpetrator doesn't bother him or her, there are a dozen
who are devastated by having to shoot someone. In addition to emotional wounds,
many victims have physical wounds from their attack. Occasionally, these victims
are sued by their attacker or charged with a crime, thereby causing financial
chaos in their lives.
The Foundation should create a way to provide funding for counselors,
psychologists or psychiatrists, medical help when necessary, and legal
assistance.
3. We must form a Second Amendment
think-tank.
Solutions are available to most problems. Regular meetings of pro-gun
enthusiasts should be held to address problems faced by the gun rights
community. Things to consider should include but not be limited to: how to
respond to school shootings; how to get hunters and
other gun owners involved in the fight to restore the Second Amendment; and how
to reverse the messages being
sent to our children in some schools that guns are evil.
These are just a few ideas that should be considered by those of us who are
interested in maintaining our right to bear arms. If we stand still, or continue
to react defensively, we will lose our rights. We must take the offensive.
The title of my article is, "A Bridge to the Second Amendment." It is
my belief that once people understand the value of armed self-defense, they will
realize what the Founding Fathers meant when they included the right to keep and
bear arms as the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights.
Also from Robert Waters...
|
|
|
