This article was printed from KeepAndBearArms.com.
For more gun- and freedom-related information, visit
http://www.KeepAndBearArms.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------
|
Hochstatter's Bills
From: robert n lyman <rlyman@u.washington.edu> Rep. Gutierrez-Kenney,
The Yakima Herald quoted you as
saying that Rep. Hochstatter's effort to over turn the state's "Gun-free
schools" law was "unconscionable". You call allowing "people
to go to work with our children while carrying firearms" "ridiculous".
You claim that shootings involving
student perpetrators show why it is imperative to keep all guns out of school.
As a 46th district voter, I am eager
to understand the logic behind these comments. Could you please answer the following
questions:
How does a shooting by a 14-year-old
relate to the ability of teachers to carry guns? The student is not a teacher,
and is too young to legally posses a gun or obtain a concealed carry permit.
How would a teacher possessing a gun (assuming it was carried responsibly) promote
student violence?
How do you intend to "keep
all guns out of school" when the shootings in question demonstrate beyond
any doubt that such a thing is impossible, or possible only with outrageously
expensive and intrusive airport-type security?
Do you believe that mere possession
of a gun turns an ordinary, responsible adult into a murderer? If so, how can
you explain the 80 million gun owners in the US who are NOT murderers? How do
you explain the more than 250,000 WA residents with concealed carry permits
who are NOT murderers? Do you believe that a responsible adult who carries a
gun off campus will suddenly become a murderer merely by stepping into a school
zone? When you say "keep all guns out of school," do you include guns
carried by police officers? If so, how should unarmed police respond to a school
shooting or other crime on campus? If not, why not? After all, if a teacher
with a post-graduate education and years of teaching experience is not to be
trusted not to murder his or her students, why should a less-educated cop with
no experience with children be trusted? Can you provide any evidence or even
a single anecdote involving a properly-licensed adult carrying a concealed weapon
legally who suddenly decided to kill children in school? Or is it the case that
school shootings are cause by underage students and criminal adults who have
no legal right to be armed anywhere?
Oregon schools are not "gun-free."
Can you provide evidence that they are less safe than Washington schools? If
so, are they less safe because legally armed teachers kill unruly students?
Rep. Gutierrez-Kenney, please do
not respond with emotional pleading. That would be a waste of time for both
of us. You are intelligent enough to see that my questions are rational and
that a rational public policy must depend on the answers to them.
I will share a secret with you that
only a handful of my closest friends know. I carry a gun almost every day for
protection. I am careful to avoid places such as schools and post offices where
doing so is illegal. I resent your implication that I am a violent criminal
simply because I refuse to allow myself or my family to be victimized. I resent
your claim that I am somehow unfit to work with children. It reminds me a great
deal of the claim that homosexuals are unfit to be teachers, and offends me
no less. Because we both know the answer to the above questions, and because
we both know that they show your anti-gun-owner position to be without logic,
I am forced to believe that you are prejudiced against innocent people who own
guns, just as many conservatives harbor prejudice toward gays.
Perhaps Rep. Hochstatter has soured
you on gun owners generally. This makes as much sense as judging all homosexuals
by the intentionally outrageous conduct of a few drag queens. We are a diverse
and many-faceted group, and we deserve better than to be treated as criminals.
I am disappointed in you.
Robert Lyman To Get Your Letters Printed Here |
||||||||