|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Time to dissolve the Union
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The political division in this country is Grand Canyon-esque in size and scope, and it would be impossible to build a bridge that could overcome that gap. Let’s face it, half of our country wants to usher in global socialism, while the other half wants nationalistic capitalism. Half of the country wants government controls over every aspect of your life, while the other half values the individual rights, freedom and liberty that were envisioned by the Founding Fathers. One half wants to ban guns, while the other half wants the freedom to bear arms that is guaranteed by the Second Amendment. One half wants to defund the police, while the other half wants to ensure law and order. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/24/2020)
|
| Interesting idea, but it ain't gonna happen. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
