|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
-none-
(7/29/2016)
|
“In the spirit of the ‘Not on My Watch’ initiative, department members will continue to hold each other accountable and will act swiftly to report any behavior that might bring dishonor to the Police Department,” Acting Police Chief Toney Chaplin said in a statement. "The arrest stems from an investigation that began last summer by SFPD’s Internal Affairs Division, which looked into Abrahamsen based on information from other department members, according to Andraychak."
sold out by his own unelected stormtroopers of death. Only elected pro 2A Sheriff has any credibility in Post-Constitution era, whatsoever. now he won't even get a security guard job, like this mexican: koin.com/2016/07/26/documents-kaylee-sawyer-hit-by-car-body-dumped/ |
Comment by:
laker1
(7/29/2016)
|
You can bet he and a bunch of his buddies voted for Obama twice like the majority of public servants. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|