|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
RangerJEB
(2/15/2019)
|
This is a very good opinion piece I would like to share via Facebook and email but I see no easy way to do this.
|
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(2/15/2019)
|
| Illogical and delusional. It's the criminals. Depriving the rights of law abiding folks will not justify the inability to control criminals. Just more feel good. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/15/2019)
|
"[W]hen an intruder comes through your door and your self defense weapon is inside a locked storage container; has a trigger lock on it; and the ammunition is, by law, stored in a separate locked container, the use of that gun for immediate self defense and protection of your property is totally denied to you."
It's already been held unconstitutional, so how can these yahoos continue to defy the law with impunity?
“Held:
“3) …the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional.” - D.C. v. Heller (2008) |
| Comment by:
lbauer
(2/15/2019)
|
RangerJEB
Just copy the header at the top of your browser.
You can then send it via e-mail or post in FaceBook and it will serve as a link to take anyone straight to the article.
https://ctmirror.org/category/ct-viewpoints/we-dont-need-more-gun-laws-that-dont-work/ |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
