|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Doctors Have Right, Duty to Discuss Gun Safety
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 6 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In a nation with more than 30,000 annual deaths from gunfire, and more than 70,000 injuries, promoting the safe storage and handling of guns is an obvious task for public health professionals. At least, it should be. As a paper published online last week at the Annals of Internal Medicine argues, physicians have both a legal right and professional duty to ask patients about gun ownership and storage. |
Comment by:
kangpc
(5/24/2016)
|
The docs are taking the offensive to divert our attention away from the fact that THEY are responsible for far more deaths than are firearms. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/05/03/researchers-medical-errors-now-third-leading-cause-of-death-in-united-states/
And don't ignore the fact that the editorial is sourced to "Bloomberg View." That should tell you something.
|
Comment by:
shootergdv
(5/24/2016)
|
Hmmm. More folks die in car accidents, right ? Anybody's doc ask 'em if they have cars/how many cars they have, how fast they will go , how fast they drive 'em ? etc. |
Comment by:
teebonicus
(5/24/2016)
|
They do not.
Absent a direct connection to a medical or mental health condition, their speech can be controlled by state law under ethics standards.
|
Comment by:
mickey
(5/24/2016)
|
Let me rephrase that for you: Doctors have right, duty to discuss car safety.
Or, Doctors have right, duty, to discuss pool safety.
Or, Doctors should spend so much time lecturing you on product safety issues that they don't have time to diagnose or treat your injury or illness. |
Comment by:
jdege
(5/24/2016)
|
In my mind, any physician who is qualified and certified to provide advice concerning firearms safety should be free to do so.
In other words, if a physician wants to dispense advice concerning firearms safety, they can take the classes:
http://training.nra.org/instructors.aspx
|
Comment by:
stevelync
(5/26/2016)
|
They won't be discussing such matters with me until I see a training certificate from Gunsite, LFI, Thunder Ranch or other such training facility. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|