|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
PA: Take away guns
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Why is it so hard to comprehend this concept? Just take away the guns, and our children won't get killed.
Is money more important than our children's lives? The National Rifle Association and the antiquated Second Amendment should not take priority over these innocent lives.
I am a members[sic] of the Daughters of the American Revolution, and I am very proud of my ancestry and heritage and patriots that fought for my freedom, but that was then and this is now. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/25/2018)
|
Wadda schmuck.
There's nothing 'hard' about it per se. Lenin, Mao, Hitler and Stalin took away fundamental rights all the time!
What IS 'hard' about it HERE is that our country was founded on individual rights, autonomy and ordered liberty guaranteed by the people's ability to be armed, and no matter what, 80+ million of us WILL NOT allow that to happen. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(5/25/2018)
|
Try to take away guns........
.....And a LOT of uniforms are gonna likely get lots of free samples ..... of lead..... ain't gonna be pretty.
M O L O N L A B E ! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|