|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI: Man shoots teens allegedly trying to rob him in Detroit
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"For the second time in a week, two alleged teenage robbers have been shot by their intended victim."
"The incident occurred at about 9 p.m. Thursday in an alley ... near Schoolcraft Roads."
"'The victims, each age 59, were working on a public lighting pole…when the two teenagers approached, produced a weapon and announced a robbery,' Sgt. Eren Stephens said."
"According to Stephens, one of the intended victims possessed a valid concealed pistol license (CPL)."
"'During the robbery, the CPL holder fired shots, striking both teenagers. The first teenager, age 16, is listed in critical condition. The second teen, 17, is listed in temporary serious condition.'"
"'The victims were unharmed.'" ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|