
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
mickey
(6/4/2016)
|
Next month: 600 things Cosmo has said about guns that are completely untrue. |
Comment by:
lbauer
(6/4/2016)
|
Typical liberal lawyereze hit piece. Everything Trump said in each of these statements was essentially true though he may have over stated some details. So this article nitpicks on that. Hillary won't abolish 2A she'll just emasculate it. Gun free zones are a really good thing because they keep honest carry permit holders unarmed. Killers and terrorists couldn't care less. Chicago has some of the most egregious gun control in the US so of course gangs and other criminals get their guns from other states which is already a felony. So make more laws they won't obey. I'm sure that will work. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(6/4/2016)
|
Chicago's gun violence is bad because the bad guys get guns from neighboring areas. If guns were the problem, why do those "neighboring areas" have less gun violence than Chicago? Shifting blame is a fun game to play, isn't it? |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|