|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
How Guns, And Their Increasing Deadliness, Affect Chicago Crime
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
After last year's news-dominating surge in homicides, everyone in Chicago is looking for answers. A new study of last year’s spike in gun violence, published on Tuesday by the University of Chicago’s Crime Lab, is more descriptive than prescriptive, but the prevalence and increased deadliness of firearms in Chicago it finds jumps off the page. Homicides in Chicago involve guns at rates higher than many other cities; guns being used are more lethal than in the past; and non-gun crimes aren’t rising the same way gun crimes are, the study determined. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(1/18/2017)
|
| Firearms are as leathal as the ammo used!!! |
| Comment by:
jac
(1/18/2017)
|
All that is required to reduce this violence is to lock the miscreants up for a long time at the first opportunity instead of releasing them on miniscule bond or probation.
Locking them up will serve two purposes. One, it reduces the number of thugs on the street. Two, it serves notice to the ones that are left that continuing criminal behavior will get them locked up.
Until the democrats in charge of Chicago get this message the crime and killings will continue out of control. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/18/2017)
|
The article SHOULD be about "How Democrats, And Their Stubborn 'Progressive' Mismanagement, Negatively Affect Liberty And Prosperity In The Murder Capital Of The United States"
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
