|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
TX: Houston program offers free shotguns (video available)
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"What's missing in high crime areas? More guns? One Houston man's controversial experiment is training and arming women to protect themselves for free."
"As the debate over gun control heats up in Washington, one Houstonian's plan is to give away shotguns to women in crime-stricken neighborhoods. He wants to train them to be ready for the worst."
"Kyle Coplen with the Armed Citizen Project said, 'If someone does break into your house, you don't really need to be an expert marksman to shoot down your hallway and hit them.'"
"[Kyle] says he's not concerned with second amendment debates right now. He's says he wants to give away shotguns to test whether it helps reduce crime. For about a month now, Coplen's been on a mission." ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|