|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Shotguns for home defense
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In my last column, I wrote about the fact that I am not familiar with shotguns. To hedge a bit, I admit I am not familiar with shotguns, but I am familiar with firearms.
Thus I recognize the role a shotgun can play in capable hands, albeit they might not be my hands. That’s why I confidently recommend a shotgun as a desirable tool for defending the home.
Of course, pistols and rifles often play a home defense role, but shotguns have unique qualities suitable for this job. |
| Comment by:
solarpower947
(5/22/2020)
|
Shotguns might be a bit more advance when it comes for home defence. Otherwise, normal guns would do fine.
https://www.solarpanelcostprice.com.au |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
