|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI:Michigan Democrats introduce 2 bills banning concealed carry in and around the Capitol
Submitted by:
Corey Salo
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Michigan Democrats have introduced two bills in the State House that would ban open and concealed carry of firearms in the Capitol Building, on Capitol grounds, and at the Legislative buildings for the House and Senate in downtown Lansing.
State Rep. Tyrone Carter, D-6th District, one of the bills' Democratic sponsors and a former law enforcement officer, said both he and his wife, retired sergeants, have concealed pistol licenses.
“I’m okay with giving mine up if everyone else gives theirs up,” said Carter. “The thing is, 'Democrats are trying to take our guns away' – nobody’s trying to take your guns away. But there needs to be limits and qualifiers to the responsibility of owning a gun.”
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/28/2021)
|
| No-no Loosie you cehn't. [smirk] |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
