|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Second Amendment seems to be in trouble
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"I'm worried that the Supreme Court is rethinking the Second Amendment."
"The First Amendment is under attack by an administration that would be quite comfortable with sedition laws. The war on terrorism has stretched the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to near irrelevance."
"Last week, an administration official said we need to rethink our right to privacy. Apparently that pesky Fourth Amendment is getting in the way of their domestic spying."
"The Constitution, with its Bill of Rights, is the guarantor of our liberty. The Second Amendment is our emergency brake."
"Our armed, treasonous forefathers risked it all to win our liberty. Since then, millions have given life and limb to preserve it." ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|