|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
To Build a Case for Guns in Public, a Judge Cited Racist Antebellum Legal Precedents
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The decision was authored by Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain, a Reagan appointee, who argues that courts cannot consider the implications of gun laws on public safety, but instead must limit themselves to evaluating a given firearm restriction against the text of the Constitution, legal tradition, and other historical evidence. Then O’Scannlain turns to such precedent — some of which is dubious at best.
Namely, the judge cites a set of gun cases from the antebellum South, when the meaning of armed self defense in public was inseparable from a culture of dueling and fear of slave revolts. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/27/2018)
|
Memo to The Trace:
Stick a fork in yourself, you're done.
It's only a matter of time. Right now this ruling only affects the Western states and Hawaii - if the en banc 9th Circuit Court reverses, it will go to the SCOTUS where it will be upheld, thence to apply to the whole country.
Your meat's cooked. Would you like some potatoes to go with it? |
| Comment by:
mickey
(7/27/2018)
|
These newslinks should come with a warning. Instead of opening with a state's abbreviation, they should start with "MediaMatters:" or "TheTrace:"
Anyway, if an 1800s decision which said that freed slaves had a right to carry openly but no right to carry concealed is too "racist" for The Trace, I assume The Trace believes that all citizens have the right to carry concealed and openly? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling in terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? [...] The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!" —Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago (Chapter 1 "Arrest") |
|
|
