|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
KS: Concealed handguns should be restricted on campus in Kansas
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Whatever your opinion on guns, most of us would probably agree: there are certain places where we ought to be particularly careful, to ensure that, whether we allow guns or not, they do not inadvertently cause injury. Making the top of most our lists, probably, are places like nuclear facilities, laboratories with dangerous chemicals, airports, hospitals and other medical facilities, and places where mental health care is being administered. Likely somewhere near the top, too, are places like day cares, other places with particularly young people and, perhaps, places with large-capacity crowds, like stadiums. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(10/6/2016)
|
| In other words, just where you have the proven places mass murder happens most often you can't have weapons to protect yourself. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
