|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI: Guns in the Capitol make a mockery of Second Amendment rights
Submitted by:
Corey Salo
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Should visitors should be barred from carrying firearms into the state Capitol?
You know, the way they're forbidden to carry them into the state Supreme Court, the Secretary of State's office, and the governor's mansion?
Well, of course they should, for heaven's sake.
And responsible gun owners, and the organizations that look out for their interests, ought to be leading the campaign to secure that no-brainer prohibition.
It's been a week since armed protesters swarmed the spectators' gallery of the state Senate and mustered outside the door to House chambers, mugging for photographers and asserting their constitutional right to visit the barber, although many did not seem conspicuously concerned with personal grooming. |
| Comment by:
shootergdv
(5/7/2020)
|
| It's either a right or it's not . If it makes libtards and RINOS feel better, carry concealed - but to date at any rally/protest where 2A supporters have gathered, no shooting. Can't say the same for any night in Detroit. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|
