|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Obama: Legal guns drive wedge between cops and communities
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Legal ownership of weapons is creating tensions between police officers and communities, President Obama said to buttress his call for tighter gun laws. "Part of what's creating tensions between communities and the police is the fact that police are having a really difficult time in communities where they know guns are everywhere," Obama said during a NATO press conference in Warsaw, Poland. "They have a right to come home, and now they have very little margin for error in terms of making decisions. So if you care about the safety of our police officers, then you can't set aside the gun issue and pretend that that's irrelevant."
|
Comment by:
xqqme
(7/11/2016)
|
Actually, Mr. President, the mere presence of firearms isn't the issue at all. It's the active presence of a criminal sub-culture with a substantial support base, and the lies told and re-told... "...hands up, don't shoot..." being one example. If it's wrong to hold all responsible for the actions of a few, then it's wrong to hold all police and gun owners responsible for the actions of a few as well. Of course there will be incidents of wrongdoing among police and other government officials { cough... Hillary.... cough }, but let's hold those individuals responsible for their misdeeds. You seem to not only want to spread the wealth around, but the blame as well: now that's true socialism. |
Comment by:
jdege
(7/11/2016)
|
It's true that an armed citizenry can sometimes pose a threat to the machinery of the state.
When this is true, there's something wrong with the machinery of the state, not with the armed populace. |
Comment by:
laker1
(7/11/2016)
|
Obama Bin Laden's policies are coming to fruition. Attacking cops at every possible incident through the DOJ, jail breaking 10's of thousands of convicted felons, second class jobs created, terrorists release from Gitmo, and Hillary allowed to run free and run for President. That is just a start. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|