|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Gun Control Lobby Wants to Hear from You
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A pair of gun control lobbying groups, Brady and the Seattle-based Alliance for Gun Responsibility, want to hear from you, or at least some of you who have received email questionnaires in recent days, one asking about legislative priorities and the other about arming teachers.
Brady is the latest incarnation of the organization originally named in honor of the late James Brady, who was permanently disabled in the attempted assassination of then-President Ronald Reagan by an individual who violated existing gun control laws at the time. |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(6/18/2019)
|
| America... Love it, or leave it. Please go find somewhere that you can love. You will not be missed.. |
| Comment by:
jac
(6/18/2019)
|
| They don't want to hear from me. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
