|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jughead
(11/7/2017)
|
| i dont think the second has anything to do with hunting. more i read the more it seems to be to keep a rogue nation in line. the gov is supposes to be working for us not the other way around |
| Comment by:
dasing
(11/7/2017)
|
| THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ASSUALT RIFLE...assault troops use select fire (machine guns) weapons. NOT assault weapons!!!!!!! |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(11/7/2017)
|
The whole of the English Language is now under assault. It's crazy.
The term "assault rifle" is actuall a "term of art." If I am attacking someone with a bolt action .22LR rifle, a single shot Flintlock Kentucky Long Rifle, or a Garand, I'm "assaulting" them .... so maybe what I'm using is an "assault rifle?" A Kentucky Flintlock is....an.... ASSAULT RIFLE?
No, assault rifles --meaning AR type --- are actually used for shooting contests, sports, and, yes, HUNTING. There are other calibers available (.308 and .300 blackout) that are even better calibers for hunting the big stuff. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
