
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
netsyscon
(12/7/2015)
|
and shame on you for spreading your liberal drivel. |
Comment by:
jac
(12/7/2015)
|
Another brain dead liberal weighs in.
This was a terrorist shooting in a California county that refuses to issue concealed carry permits. If you want to blame anyone/anything, start with the victim disarmament mentally prevalent in that county.
France does not have a NRA and has draconian restrictions on semi automatic weapons. That didn't stop radical muslims from obtaining full automatic weapons and killing many people.
Criminals, sickos, wackos, and terrorists will get guns regardless of any restrictions placed on gun purchase and ownership. Gun control laws only restrict the law abiding citizens that are not causing any problems. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|