|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
lostone1413
(6/27/2015)
|
| These shooting are staged events to further the Governments agenda on gun control. Funny you never heard of such things until the Government pulled off 9-11. If you don't think that the Government wouldn't do such a thing then your not old enough to remember the Bay Of Tonkin or you need to do some research |
| Comment by:
punch
(6/27/2015)
|
| A minor correction: It was not "Bay Of Tonkin". It was the "Gulf Of Tonkin". Yes, I remember it. I served from 1965 through 1969. Little known fact: it is also known as the USS Maddox Incident. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(6/27/2015)
|
Alas, I agree with Mr. Norris our 'modern' houses of worship are no longer sanctuaries respected by all. Indeed, quite the opposite, if the rantings of some of the more vitriolic religious zealots are ceded credence.
But I submit all of us have a vested interest in the continued health and well-being of Mr. Roof, the alleged Charleston shooter. First, because he's presently alive and available for extended interrogation and examination. Its reported he intended to commit suicide, ( or, possibly his programming failed at this point?). There is a great deal worth detailed examination in Mr. Roof's manifesto. Just as there is the background and history of the AME churches. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
