|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Worried about your kid's safety? Look at guns in the home, first
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Because your child is constantly changing, gun safety at any age is an important discussion to have with your child’s doctor. On average, 19 children are shot every day in the U.S., either intentionally or unintentionally. Seven die. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has a goal to make these accidental injuries a thing of the past.
The AAP policy on gun safety recommends that there be no guns in a home where children live. 80 percent of gun injuries to children under 15 occur at home. Despite parents’ warnings, children just don’t realize how dangerous a gun can be. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/17/2018)
|
Rebecca Carchmann - Do you vote Democrat?
Then, nothing you say has any credence whatsoever. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|