|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
AR: Gun nuts living in ‘La La Land’
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Some people even say that every mass shooting just proves that we actually need more guns to protect ourselves from all these shooters. And I just imagine myself turning to Ethel and her friend in that darkened theater and saying, “Hey, would some more raping convince you that you are actually watching ‘La La Land’?”
It’s not mental health or unlocked doors enabling so many mass shootings here in ’Murica. It’s the guns, plain and simple. The ease with which one can acquire a gun here has indelibly transformed the United States into the kind of place where these shootings will happen on a regular basis. |
| Comment by:
netsyscon
(12/9/2022)
|
See Chicago... The most opresive antigun government i have ever known. Also the most weekly people shot or killed!!!
Me, my guns (yes multiple guns) have only shot paper targets. I enjoy shooting like you enjoy bowling.
SIGNED Gun Nut |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
