|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(2/23/2015)
|
This is a common scenario across NJ. Folks move next door to a long-established business/facility, (often even threatening litigation over those businesses attempts to educate them about circumstances) only to soon engage in litigation to disrupt or eliminate that business. A classic CIP identical to this shooting facility's situation is the on-going account of Solberg Airport.
The (very) few remaining NJ farmers face similar actions regularly as "new complaints" discover the " surrounding luscious, idyllic green fields" they were shown by a realtor result from fertilizing, tilling, tending and harvesting operations that include aromas, dust, noise and traffic inconveniences on a season cycle. New complaints never change.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|
