|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Big Government Can’t Fight Terrorism at Home
Submitted by:
Rob Morse
Website: http://slowfacts.wordpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Both French and US government officials spoke again about terrorism. Again they proposed to disarm innocent citizens. They said the government would protect citizens from terrorists .. given enough time. We’ve seen the casualty count from that failed idea.
We’ve also seen how armed citizens succeed and stop mass murder again and again. Citizens will have to protect themselves without waiting for government help .. and they can. |
| Comment by:
Uncommon1
(4/26/2016)
|
| Eventually. Nice word. That means every time some nasty goat raping savage wants to go ballistic, the government will come in after the fact and say "Yes, this looks like a case of terrorism." In the meantime, another two dozen innocent American citizens have been murdered for no other reason than the fact they aren't worshipers of the pedophile prophet. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
