|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jfrey@cox-internet.com
(7/30/2001)
|
| "SO WHAT?" Springfield is better, and Taurus is less expensive. |
| Comment by:
grncioc@keepandbeararms.com
(7/31/2001)
|
| Now that the threat of lawsuits has waned significantly, Colt has decided to come out from cover. I haven't really missed them much. |
| Comment by:
blacksnake@keepanbeararms.com
(7/31/2001)
|
| Last I heard, Colt is still in the grip of an anti-gun pal of anti-gun politicians (Schumer, Feinstiein) that took under the table advantage to sell M4 carbines exclusively to the military at the expense of civilian sales of such so-called "assault weapons"(militia rifles)...If Colt is now changed thier minds to sell handguns to civilians, it must be greed for profits, not because they love RKBA!...Anyone have new info on this? |
|
|
