With all the media induced frenzy over gun control, the 80,000 Million
Mommies, and the President's various plans surrounding the issue, I have to say
that in reality gun control really does work. There are volumes of evidence to
prove this. Before anyone gets the wrong impression (like, hey I thought this
guy was opposed to gun control) let me explain how it works.
Gun control is an effective tool when dealing with crime. It has proven to
have profound results. Why, in Australia alone gun control has had a dramatic
affect on the crime rate. Don't believe it?
Australia banned private ownership of most guns in 1996, crime has risen
dramatically on that continent, prompting critics of U.S. gun control efforts to
issue new warnings of what life in America could be like if Congress ever bans
firearms. After Australian lawmakers passed widespread gun bans, (law-abiding)
gun owners were forced to surrender about 650,000 weapons, which were later
slated for destruction, according to statistics from the Australian Sporting
Shooters Association.
The bans were not limited to so-called "assault" weapons or
military-type firearms, but also to .22 rifles and shotguns. The effort cost the
Australian government about $500 million, said association representative Keith
Tidswell. Though lawmakers responsible for passing the ban promised a safer
country, the nation's crime statistics tell a different story:
Countrywide, homicides are up 3.2 percent; Assaults are up 8.6 percent;
Amazingly, armed robberies have climbed nearly 45 percent;
In the Australian state of Victoria, gun homicides have climbed 300 percent;
In the 25 years before the gun bans, crime in Australia had been dropping
steadily, now there has been a reported "dramatic increase" in home
burglaries and assaults on the elderly.
At the time of the ban, which followed an April 29, 1996 shooting at a Port
Arthur tourist spot by lone gunman Martin Bryant, the continent had an annual
murder-by-firearm rate of about 1.8 per 100,000 persons, "a safe society by
any standards," said Tidswell. But such low rates of crime and rare
shootings did not deter then-Prime Minister John Howard from calling for and
supporting the weapons ban.
The statistics speak for themselves, and gun control works. The problem is
"who" it works for. Everyone interested in the subject is by now
familiar with John Lott's work "More Guns, Less Crime". Dr. Lott
admits he had no interest in firearms until he began to research the affects of
gun control on society. His conclusions led him to write a very exhaustive piece
of research that proved that an armed populace is the greatest deterrent to
crime.
- States which passed concealed carry laws reduced their murder rate by
8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assaults by 7% and robbery by 3%; and,
- If those states not having concealed carry laws had adopted such laws in
1992, then approximately 1,570 murders, 4,177 rapes, 60,000 aggravated
assaults and 12,000 robberies would have been avoided yearly.
Again I will say it: gun control works (for the criminal). Tell me how you
feel when you take your family out to eat or just an afternoon at the mall and
are forced to sit at a stop light where thugs happen to be hanging around on
that particular corner. If you live in a state where the gun laws are
hyper-oppressive, and being the model law-abiding citizen (ready-made-victim)
you are, odds are great that you are not armed. Knowing your state law prohibits
you from practicing self-defense, do these seedy individuals have greater
confidence in approaching you? Think about it.
Here in America we are in the pre-ban phase of gun control. The tighter the
gun control restrictions become, the higher the crime rate goes up. Washington
DC and Chicago, IL are two examples of rigid gun control law that have led to an
exploding crime rate. The arguments of both cities as to why this has happened
crosses the line of stupidity. "Guns are being brought in from other areas
and used to perform criminal acts in our city" is what you get from both
mayors of these crime infested metropolises. Duh! Criminals don't close the
doors and have going out of business sales, they just choose to operate in areas
that offer the least amount of resistance and our benevolent government seems
all to happy to oblige.
Several years ago California required law-abiding citizens who owned one of
those wicked looking "assault" rifles to register with the state. This
was done with the state going out of it's way to guarantee these law-abiding
citizens that their second Amendment rights were not being infringed and that
this was not a pre-confiscation maneuver. Later when the state was proposing
stricter gun control measures and banning so-called "assault" weapons
one politician made the statement that we now have all the names, let's just go
to their homes and take them. I like what one person has called this; People
Registration, because that's what it is.
Watch closely those countries that have recently banned citizens from
defending themselves from common street criminals. The "real"
criminals are not far behind and they want more than your wife's jewelry or that
forty bucks you have in your wallet. They want more than what that of a sick
mind requires in order to fulfill a rapists needs.
Guns are less available now in this country than they have ever been. There
are more restrictions on our Second Amendment rights than any time in history.
Laws that make the law-abiding jump through any number of hoops just to exercise
a right are written in volumes. Certain weapons have been banned in many areas
of the country. Gun control is here and according to the gun grabbers crime
should be all but eliminated. Yet we have a growing ATF and FBI. We have a
military style local police force that is becoming more and more beholding to
the federal government. Why?
There has been a political ideology in place for years that seems to float
from one society to the next and it has historically sought to destroy and
dominate those who disagree with it. It has found a home here in America and has
been allowed to flourish under our form of government. This ideology has chosen
it's side and controls the very foundations that we depend on. It has perverted
every social institution in the land and made that which was abnormal the norm.
It has created enemies of the state by influencing government to take a side on
issues where the government is required to remain neutral. Bill Clinton may be
out of job in six months but his party will still be in Washington, and no
matter what happens in this coming November's election, this ideology has
infected both parties now. They both see the possibilities and political
advantages that will come from an unarmed populace!
The "real" criminals don't necessarily show their true colors
immediately, but in the end they always do. And they always eliminate their
opposition. History doesn't lie:
- "In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to
1953, about 20 million dissidents, were rounded up and exterminated.
- "In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5
million Armenians, were rounded up and exterminated.
- "Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13
million Jews and others were rounded up and exterminated.
- "China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million
political dissidents, were rounded up and exterminated.
- "Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981,
100,000 Mayan Indians, were rounded up and exterminated.
- "Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000
Christians, were rounded up and exterminated.
- "Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one
million 'educated' people, were rounded up and exterminated."
- Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because
of gun control: 56 million.
So don't tell me gun control doesn't work! The numbers prove it!
The big lie is about who gun control works for!
Alan Lundy is another American who writes for Freedom with
KeepAndBearArms.com. Please click the Email To A Friend graphic below and
send this to someone who is sitting on the fence about gun control.