|
Bach
v. Pataki
in the News
"Adopting a position that the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution does not protect a fundamental individual right, a Northern District judge has held that a U.S. naval attorney with top-secret security clearance can be barred by New York from carrying a concealed weapon while visiting relatives in Ulster County, N.Y."
"Challenge
to Ban on Non-Resident Weapons Permit Fails", by John
Caher, New York Law Journal (Friday
October 3, 2003)
(law.com
- yahoo
- archived)
Additional
Information on Bach v. Pataki:
Overview
of the Case
This includes a synopsis of the case, the objectives of
the case, statements from the originator of the case and
our relationship with him, and our commitment to the
case.
Status
of the Case
This includes each filing in the case to date and what
comes next.
Bach
in the News
This includes links to media reports about Bach v.
Pataki.
Home
Page
The official home page for Bach v. Pataki is http://KeepAndBearArms.com/Bach.
That home page is permanent and will remain in place
until we are victorious or until we are denied our
rightful day in court to legitimately address our
grievances.
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|