Keep and Bear Arms
Home Members Login/Join About Us News/Editorials Archives Take Action Your Voice Web Services Free Email
You are 1 of 1989 active visitors Friday, March 29, 2024

Silveira v. Lockyer

Keep and Bear Arms

Silveira v. Lockyer -- Issue Home Page

Latest Ruling in Case

Overview of Silveira v. Lockyer

Silveira v. Lockyer in the News

Help with Funding

Status of Funding



KABA Email List:
Click Here

KABA State Lists:
Click Here

Keep and Bear Arms

SUPPORT KABA

Keep and Bear Arms
Keep and Bear Arms » Join Online
» Join by Mail
» Make a Donation
»
Magazine Subscriptions

» KABA Memorial Fund
» Advertise Here
» Pro Gun Long Distance
» Buy KABA Merchandise
» Shop Our Mall Stores

JOIN  NOW!

Keep and Bear Arms

Keep and Bear Arms

National Review Online and 2nd Amendment:

Publishes Kopel Smear Job, Refuses Rebuttal

October 15, 2003

Over three weeks ago, NationalReview.com allowed their writer to smear the Silveira v. Lockyer Second Amendment lawsuit we are funding and smear the people involved. Kopel's weapon of choice was misinformation, and plenty of it. His smears came out one week before the Supreme Court was due to consider the lawsuit -- long after such a smear campaign could serve any useful purpose.

In an effort to allow NRO to appear fair and balanced, we offered to submit a rebuttal. They agreed to print our reply to their writer's hit piece smearing Silveira v. LockyerKathryn Lopez, National Review Online Editor, strung us along for over a week, assuring us repeatedly that she would publish our rebuttal to Kopel's article.

We waited on them based on their word that they'd run it. Now they refuse, based on the flimsiest of reasons.

They are protecting their writer, who clearly spreads misinformation. We offered to let them run:

KOPEL CLUELESS:
Silveira Lawsuit Attacker is Shooting Blanks
by Roy Lucas

October 15, 2003
http://KeepAndBearArms.com/Silveira/Kopel.asp

Following are the email exchanges where their Editor repeatedly said they would run it.

NRO has space to disparage an important Second Amendment case currently awaiting a grant of certiorari (a decision to hear the case) by the U.S. Supreme Court. They have space to promote the government's "Total Information Awareness" system as a blessing when it's a curse. They have space to run movie reviews glorifying violence. But they refuse to provide space for a rebuttal to a hatchet job on Second Amendment lawyers and activists. 

Feel free to contact NRO's editor, and Mr. David Kopel, to express your concerns.

National Review Online Editor, Kathryn Lopez: klopez@nationalreview.com

National Review Online Smear Campaigner, David Kopel: davekopel@hotmail.com

Other National Review Online Email Contacts:

Submissions: submissions@nationalreview.com
Letters: letters@nationalreview.com
Webmaster: webmaster@nationalreview.com
Advertising: lcapano@nationalreview.com

OR

Write or call:
National Review
215 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10016
212-679-7330

Subscriber Customer Service: 815-734 1232


FIRST, WE TRIED THEIR PUBLISHED EMAIL ADDRESSES:

From: "Angel Shamaya" <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
To: nronline@nationalreview.com, submissions@nationalreview.com 
Date sent: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 01:13:52 -0700
Subject: YOUR ATTACK ON ALLIES, REBUTTAL IN ORDER
Priority: urgent

Friends at NationalReview.com

Dave Kopel attacked a true Second Amendment case in which our organization [and our fellow organization] has invested over $60,000 and lots of painstaking care and devotion -- and he did it on your website.

We have written to request space to rebut but have heard nothing back as of yet, though it's been several days. 

The attorney who's done most of the later work on the Silveira v. Lockyer case is drafting a careful, civil, thorough response -- and we are asking you to be fair and publish it. Allowing us to respond to direct, calculated attacks is the honorable thing to do, and we have believed for years that your publication is run by honorable people. 

I await your reply. Our organization has been driving traffic to NRO for over three years, and we've been very consistent about it. It would sadden us greatly to find that your site is used to attack allies but precludes fair, reasoned, measured, considered responses to same. 

Respectfully, 

Angel Shamaya
KeepAndBearArms.com, the organization funding the legal research and writing in the Silveira v. Lockyer lawsuit your writer attacked.
(928) 522-8833

NO RESPONSE EVER CAME. SO WE CALLED THEM AND WERE SENT TO KATHRYN LOPEZ'S VOICE MAIL, WHERE WE GOT HER EMAIL ADDRESS AND ALSO LEFT A MESSAGE. SHE DID NOT RESPOND BY PHONE, SO WE SENT ANOTHER EMAIL:

From: Angel Shamaya <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:13 PM
To: klopez@nationalreview.com 
Subject: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE

Mrs. Lopez,

An ill-informed editorial on your website published 9/23/2003 directly attacks a Second Amendment lawsuit into which our national gun rights organization and our sister organization have invested over $60,000.

It was a two-part attack that used over 4,900 words to present a great deal of misinformation, leaving out numerous key facts -- like a hit piece we'd expect to read from gun banners. 

We've written twice to request rebuttal space. We called last week and finally got a return call today. Vicki put me through to your voice mail, and I left a message. Since your voice mail gave your email, I thought I'd try to reach you here. 

We've been sending traffic to NationalReview.com for over three years. We link to your site with regularity and even linked to the Kopel attack editorials. We are requesting and believe we deserve equal space to defend the work of which your writer clearly knows very little. 

Please respond.

Angel Shamaya
Founder/Executive Director
KeepAndBearArms.com
(928) 522-8833

KATHY RESPONDED BY EMAIL:

From: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
To: <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
Subject: RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Date sent: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:12:48 -0400 

Please do write a reponse [sic] letter (apologies--this is the first email I believe I have seen from you). shorter preferred, to whatever extent possible, but I realize you need to make your argument. thanks.

OUR REPLY, WHICH INCLUDED THE LINK TO OUR ATTORNEY'S REBUTTAL, DATED OCTOBER 6, 2003:

From: "Angel Shamaya" <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
To: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
Date sent: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 15:03:19 -0700
Subject: HERE IT IS, KATHY....RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Priority: urgent

Kathy,

Per your agreement to grant space for a Reply, following is a link to our legal researcher's Reply to Mr. Kopel's attack editorial on National Review Online. This has not been released to our thousands of daily readers -- many of whom are clamoring for a response -- because we want to let NRO release it to show that your organization is fair and balanced. We also want to assure that our Reply reaches the same people Mr. Kopel's sniping reached. 

Thank you for understanding that many arguments were raised by Mr. Kopel and need to be covered. In the interest of saving your time, we created the html-ready version for your web publishing staff -- all you really need to do is cut and paste: http://KeepAndBearArms.com/Silveira/Kopel.asp  

You are authorized to take that html page from our site, including the footnotes please, to share with NRO readers. 

Please let me know when this will run. It's been two weeks since Mr. Kopel's inaccurate editorials ran on your website, and he's caused us lots of unnecessary grief and forced us to waste precious time responding. Our people are waiting for a Reply. Can you please give us a date that it will it run on NRO? 

NOTE: We do not wish to have this edited in any way. Please run it as is. Being as we publish original works that sometimes require editing, I know that could come across as overbearing. But I ask you to understand that we are defending ourselves, not initiating this situation -- so please adhere to this respectful request. If you are unable or unwilling to print, in full, our self-defensive reply, please give us a right to review your edits and a commitment to link to the above page so people can view our response in full. 

Call if you have any questions. Have a wonderful remainder of your day and week. :-) 

Respectfully, 

Angel Shamaya
Founder/Executive Director
KeepAndBearArms.com
Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
(928) 522-8833

AFTER THREE DAYS OF NO RESPONSE, WE LEFT MRS. LOPEZ ANOTHER VOICE MAIL TO MAKE SURE SHE HAD OUR RESPONSE. SHE DID NOT CALL BACK, SO THE FOLLOWING EMAIL WAS SENT:

From: Angel Shamaya <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
To: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
Subject: Re: HERE IT IS, KATHY....RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Date sent: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:29:20 -0700

Why are you ignoring me, Kathy? Your writer attacked us with false information about our lawsuit three weeks ago. We submitted a rebuttal. I've called, I've emailed, yet I get silence. Why? Is this how NRO is? How long are we supposed to wait to hear back?

We want to reply to false information your publication printed about a lawsuit we are funding. Are you going to give us satisfaction, or not?

KATHRYN LOPEZ RESPONDED ASSURING US AGAIN THAT SHE WOULD RUN OUR REPLY:

From: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
To: <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
Subject: RE: HERE IT IS, KATHY....RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Date sent: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 19:58:53 -0400 

Mr. Shamaya, You are not being ignored. We have been preoccupied with the recall and other news events but will be running your reply in a matter of a few days. KATHRYN Lopez

WE RESPONDED BACK IMMEDIATELY:

From: "Angel Shamaya" <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
To: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
Date sent: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 17:10:38 -0700
Subject: RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Priority: normal

Kathryn,

I only used "Kathy" as that was how you referred to yourself on voice mail. I meant no offense whatsoever. 

We were attacked three weeks ago. The html is a cut and paste job. You've got time to publish movie reviews and rehashed arguments about how awful the Demoncrat party is. Why "a few days", to allow us to defend our positions, when it is our work that was attacked? Is there any way to get it up now? It'd take ten minutes max. 

If not, when does "a few days" happen, specifically? And is this about letting Mr. Kopel prepare a reply -- a courtesy we never received. 

--AS

SHE RESPONDED WITH YET ANOTHER ASSURANCE THAT SHE WOULD RUN OUR REPLY:

From: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
To: <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
Subject: RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Date sent: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 20:14:11 -0400 

Mr. Shamaya, 

Mr. Kopel has not seen your response. We have been updating software, among other things, and publishing letters this week simply has not happened. Your response will appear next week. That's how it works in our schedule, given all our current concerns. I'm sorry you are forced to see movie reviews and "rehashed argument" articles in the meantime; they are not there to offend you or your reply. Kathryn Lopez

WE ADDRESSED HER SUGGESTIONS:

From: "Angel Shamaya" <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com>
To: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
Date sent: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 17:24:39 -0700
Subject: RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Priority: normal

Kathryn,

I don't mean to suggest, in any way, that NRO's content is offensive. Other than Mr. Kopel's attack, we've been promoting NRO's content for nearly four years, very consistently. In fact, we promoted his attack, too. 

But you can't imagine how much time, energy and money [vital fundraising for the lawsuit] his article has cost us. If it was all true, we wouldn't even ask for a rebuttal, Kathryn. This may be and probably is the very first time in four years we've asked to reply to someone's criticism -- and we get plenty of negative comments made about our work, from both sides of the gun debates. It's because the criticism was wrought with false information, disinformation and downright personal attacks, and because it's been nearly three weeks, that we feel it very fair to ask to get our cut-and-paste reply published. 

Can you please just get it up there tomorrow, Kathryn? We've invested every penny we have in this lawsuit, and it's so far beyond what Mr. Kopel says it is it's not even in the same universe. Please, just get it up tomorrow. It'll take ten minutes or less. Cut, paste, stick the link on the home page. 

--AS

SHE REPLIED WITH YET ANOTHER ASSURANCE THAT THEY WOULD RUN OUR REPLY:

From: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
To: <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
Subject: RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Date sent: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 21:00:49 -0400 

Mr. Shamaya, As I said earlier, I have every intention of posting your reply next week. Unfortunately we cannot do it before then. I understand your legitimate desire to get this published; as I said, we definitely will be, sorry it cannot be on your timetable or immediately, but it will be as soon as we can--which is next week. Thank you for patience. Kathryn Lopez 

WE RESPONDED YET AGAIN, ACCEPTING THEIR STALL:

From: "Angel Shamaya" <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
To: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
Date sent: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 18:07:39 -0700
Subject: RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Priority: normal

OK. I have no choice but to accept your timeframe. Any idea what day it will happen? And do you have a policy of notifying us? Please do not take my communications as intentionally offensive, ma'am. If I offended you, I did not mean to. OK?

SHE RESPONDED SAYING THE PIECE WAS SLATED TO BE PUBLISHED MONDAY:

From: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
To: "'Director@KeepAndBearArms.com'" <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
Subject: RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Date sent: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 21:09:53 -0400 

Mr. Shamaya, My goal is to have it posted Monday. I will not guarantee that, but that is the fairly certain plan. Kathryn Lopez

WE RESPONDED WITH APPRECIATION:

From: "Angel Shamaya" <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
To: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
Date sent: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 18:14:15 -0700
Subject: RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Priority: normal

Thank you kindly for letting me know. I hope the rest of your evening is peaceful and productive. 

MONDAY CAME AND WENT. TUESDAY CAME AND WENT. WE WROTE TO FIND OUT WHAT WAS HAPPENING:

From: "Angel Shamaya" <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
To: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
Date sent: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 02:15:48 -0700
Subject: RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Priority: urgent

Kathryn,

Last Thursday, you said it was a "fairly certain plan" that our reply would be up this past Monday. I bet you forgot that Monday was a holiday. So had I. 

But it's Wednesday now -- over three weeks since the lawsuit upon which we've staked our resources and reputations was attacked by your writer. Here is our attorney's reply, again: http://KeepAndBearArms.com/Silveira/Kopel.asp  

You more definitively said our reply would be up "next week," which is now this week. Will you please follow through and give us the space to defend our work from your writer? His attack was wrought with misinformation, not just differences of opinion. We've been trying to simply defend ourselves and our work. It's a simple cut and paste task. Please respond. 

Angel Shamaya
KeepAndBearArms.com
(928) 522-8833

SHE RESPONDED TODAY, SAYING, AGAIN, THAT IT WOULD BE RUNNING:

From: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
To: <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
Subject: RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Date sent: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 05:35:28 -0400

It will be running today. 

WE RESPONDED WITH APPRECIATION:

From: "Angel Shamaya" <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
To: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
Date sent: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:26:23 -0700
Subject: RE: REBUTTAL TO NRO ATTACK ARTICLE
Priority: normal

Wonderful. Thanks. We'll keep checking your home page for it.

THEN, AFTER SAYING REPEATEDLY OVER THE COURSE OF NINE DAYS THAT SHE WOULD RUN OUR REBUTTAL, SHE WENT BACK ON HER WORD WITH THE FLIMSIEST OF EXCUSES:

From: Kathryn Jean Lopez <klopez@nationalreview.com
To: <Director@KeepAndBearArms.com
Subject: Lucas piece
Date sent: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:35:14 -0400

Dear Mr. Shamaya, 

I regret to write that I spoke too soon this morning--and last week. Having only now had the chance to read the full length of the Mr. Lucas response to Mr. Kopel's articles, I am afraid it is not something we can run on NRO. Though I understand your group invested money in the case, you or Mr. Lucas were not named in the piece, so we do not feel obliged to run the response. This is our final editorial decision. I regret I prematurely told you we would publish it. 

Sincerely,

Kathryn Lopez
Editor, National Review Online

For the record, here is the Reply NRO's editor repeatedly said they would publish:

KOPEL CLUELESS:
Silveira Lawsuit Attacker is Shooting Blanks
by Roy Lucas

October 15, 2003
http://KeepAndBearArms.com/Silveira/Kopel.asp

 QUOTES TO REMEMBER
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. ~ Marcus Tullius Cicero (42B.C)

COPYRIGHT POLICY: The posting of copyrighted articles and other content, in whole or in part, is not allowed here. We have made an effort to educate our users about this policy and we are extremely serious about this. Users who are caught violating this rule will be warned and/or banned.
If you are the owner of content that you believe has been posted on this site without your permission, please contact our webmaster by following this link. Please include with your message: (1) the particulars of the infringement, including a description of the content, (2) a link to that content here and (3) information concerning where the content in question was originally posted/published. We will address your complaint as quickly as possible. Thank you.

 
NOTICE:  The information contained in this site is not to be considered as legal advice. In no way are Keep And Bear Arms .com or any of its agents responsible for the actions of our members or site visitors. Also, because this web site is a Free Speech Zone, opinions, ideas, beliefs, suggestions, practices and concepts throughout this site may or may not represent those of Keep And Bear Arms .com. All rights reserved. Articles that are original to this site may be redistributed provided they are left intact and a link to http://www.KeepAndBearArms.com is given. Click here for Contact Information for representatives of KeepAndBearArms.com.

Thawte.com is the leading provider of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites, and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks.

KeepAndBearArms.com, Inc. © 1999-2024, All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy