What If The
Federal Government Does Conspire in Contract with the European Union to Regulate
Guns on American Soil?
by William B. Rogers, M.D.
DRWBRogers@aol.com
Following is precisely why our adversaries MUST
use due Constitutional process to attempt to formally repeal the Second
Amendment, or they must cease their "gun-grabbing" immediately:
1. "We the people," the
citizens of the free States which have chartered the federal organization known
as the United States of America, have done so under a legally binding agreement
that clearly states that "A well- regulated Militia being necessary to the
security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall
not be infringed."
2. Therefore neither the President of
the United States nor the Congress can enter into a legal agreement with another
sovereign power that in any way goes against the written, charter statement that
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
3. If the President attempts to so
engage a sovereign power, and in doing so infringes upon the right of the people
of the free States to keep and bear arms, his will be an illegal act and should
result in his being impeached.
4. If the President issues orders to the
US military (or any agency of the federal government) to support an activity
that infringes upon the right of the citizens of the free States to keep and
bear arms, those orders will be illegal, and any agent of the federal government
choosing to follow such orders will become subject to criminal indictment.
5. If a member of Congress attempts to
draft or form a treaty with a sovereign power that in any way infringes upon the
right of the people of his or her state to keep and bear arms, that Congressman
will be engaging in an illegal act and he or she will be subject to immediate
recall by the people of the State that sent him or her to represent them in
Congress.
6. If the President of the United States
or a Congressman engages in such activity as described above, and legal steps to
contain and reverse that activity are NOT taken by appropriate parties, then the
federation of free States known as the United States of America -- as defined in
the Constitution -- will no longer exist.
7. When the federation of States ceases
to exist, then each free State that comprised that federation will from that
moment on exist in relation to the other free States as it did prior to the
formation of the United States of America; that is, each free State will have
become again a sovereign entity no longer legally or morally bound to its former
commitments to the federation. Among other things, this will mean:
a. The citizens of the free States
will no longer be subject to federal law which will have ceased to exist with
loss of the charter.
b. Neither the citizens of the free
States, as individuals or as aggregate members of the governments of their
individual free States, will owe any money to the federal treasury, which will
have ceased to exist.
c. Federal agencies will no longer
have any authority over the conduct of the citizens of the free States.
d. Agents of the former federation of
free States presenting themselves to persons or homes of citizens of the free
States will have no legal authority to enforce a legal code that will at that
time no longer exist. An attempt to enforce a nonexistent legal code will be
an illegal activity, and agents caught in that act will be operating outside
of recognized legal authority --they will have become "outlaws," and
they will be treated in whatever fashion that the laws of that free State
condone, allow or demand. This will likely become a very moot point in that
persons formerly employed as agents of the federal government will also
probably be citizens of a free State and will be offered employment in the
service of their home free State.
e. The governments of the individual
free States will demand that any money in the federal treasury be returned to
the treasuries of the free States.
f. The governments of the individual
free States will demand that all military equipment, real estate, and capital
formerly laid claim to by the federation be divided equally among the free
States which formerly comprised the United States of America.
NOTE: Secession of the free States from the
United States of America will not be required or necessary in that the United
States of America will have ceased to exist the moment the Federal Government
ceases conforming its conduct to the dictates of the Constitution of the United
States.
NOTE: the term "free State" is used
specifically to mean a local government that has surrendered a degree of its
sovereignty in the service of its citizens in order to form "a more perfect
union" than was originally attempted with the Articles of Confederation. If
more sovereignty is demanded from the "free State" than it was
originally intent upon surrendering to the federation (as denoted in the
Constitution of the United States of America), then that "free State"
has become a "slave State." Those people forced to dwell in a slave
State can no longer be "free citizens." Rather, they have become
"slaves."
NOTE: discussion of these hypothetical events
and contingency planning on the part of the citizens or the governments of the
free States is NOT treason against the United States of America. The case being
discussed is one in which that august federation of free States will have ceased
to exist. On that day the establishment of Justice, the insurance of domestic
Tranquility, the provision for the common defense, the promotion of the general
Welfare, and the securing of the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our
Posterity will have again become the business primarily of the free States that
will have formerly comprised a defunct United States of America.
These, then, are the stakes for which the
"gun-grabbers" are playing. I am furious that they are willing to
destroy the United States of America. I will personally use every
opportunity I can to forward this argument. Please post your comments of
constructive criticism for all the members of our forum to see and to assist me
with the refinement of this argument.
Best regards,
Bill Rogers
Tyler, TX
DRWBRogers@aol.com
