Hungary
cracks down on gun ownership, but industry fires back
By THOMAS ORSZAG-LAND
London Observer Service May 29, 2000
BUDAPEST, Hungary - Hungary's plans to
introduce Europe's toughest gun control legislation, strictly curtailing the
possession of legally held firearms, has outraged many local special interest
groups, including private security firms, the insurance industry and sportsmen.
"Eastern Europe is still probably the
easiest place on Earth to obtain cheap handguns illegally," complains Peter
Kovacs, 47, a security officer and father of four. "A lot of kids have
them, and old ladies get shot at point-blank range for their little savings. But
if I lose my license to carry my legally obtained firearm, I would face
ruin."
Many thousands of small arms and other military
weapons were sold, abandoned or just traded for food by Red Army soldiers when
they retreated from the region after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The
Russian mafia replaced them in this respect and now is involved in massive arms
smuggling.
The recent Balkan wars as well as the
continuing violent ethnic conflicts in Kosovo have also produced a constant flow
of weapons through the region's porous frontiers.
The private security industry throughout
Eastern Europe have experienced a surge in business in the wake of the
uncontrolled proliferation of small arms ownership.
Several of Hungary's neighbors are now expected
to follow suit, introducing similarly strict gun controls, which is a
precondition to eventual membership to the European Union for many of these
nations.
Two-thirds of the 250,000 licensed weapons in
civilian ownership in Hungary are held by sportsmen and their clubs. The rest
are mainly for self-defense, used by private security guards and members of
highly privileged groups of civilians such as members of parliament, judges,
state prosecutors, tax investigators and top civil servants.
"In future, a gun license for self-defense
will be issued only in response to a specific personal threat," said Bela
Ring of the Interior Ministry legal department. "And it will have to be
carefully investigated and proven."
Zoltan Trombitas, chairman of the Association
of Gun License Holders, thinks that legally owned weapons have not been used for
a criminal purpose in Hungary for many years. "The authorities should
concentrate
their resources on collecting unlicensed
weapons," he said. "... Can't they understand that lawfully armed
civilians constitute a powerful deterrent against violent crime?"
The government counters that it's not the task
of civilians to fight armed criminals and that, in a moment of deadly
confrontation, guns in civilian hands could prove a threat to innocent
bystanders.
Heti Vilaggazdasag, an influential weekly
journal, has welcomed the proposals to deprive private security companies of
their gun licenses. The journal observes that many bank robberies begin when
security guards are disarmed and their guns are turned against them by
criminals.
Mihaly Vorosmarty, chairman of the Society of
Private Investigators and Security Agencies, also favors tighter gun control
legislation. But he fears that the legislative proposals in their present form
would threaten the existence of many member companies engaged in protecting
banks and security vans used in large cash transfers.
"Security agents would become easy target
for violent attack if they were unarmed," he insists. "They face a
special threat that must be recognized through continued permission to carry
arms."
The Association of Hungarian Insurers also
fears that the proposed new law could make many high-value transactions
uninsurable. "Insurance is about risk," said association spokesman
Gyorgy Lam. "Insurance contracts covering transfers of cash, jewelry, works
of art and other treasures now prescribe the deployment of armed security agents
to cut risk factors.
"If clients were prevented by the law from
providing sufficient security cover, their contracts would need to be
renegotiated. And the consequent rise of premiums could well escalate beyond the
means of many individuals and even some financial institutions."
Lawmakers also propose limiting the number of
hunting rifles and shotguns allowed per person for sporting purposes. Members of
gun clubs would have to store their weapons in secure communal facilities and
practice shooting only at their clubs' ranges. This alone would have a
widespread restrictive effect because many clubs have neither secure storerooms
nor shooting ranges.
(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service.
For more Observer news go to http://www.guardian.co.uk.)