Keep and Bear Arms
Home Members Login/Join About Us News/Editorials Archives Take Action Your Voice Web Services Free Email
You are 1 of 769 active visitors Thursday, November 21, 2024
EMAIL NEWS
Main Email List:
Subscribe
Unsubscribe

State Email Lists:
Click Here
SUPPORT KABA
» Join/Renew Online
» Join/Renew by Mail
» Make a Donation
» Magazine Subscriptions
» KABA Memorial Fund
» Advertise Here
» Use KABA Free Email

» JOIN/Renew NOW! «
 
SUPPORT OUR SUPPORTERS

 

YOUR VOTE COUNTS

Keep and Bear Arms - Vote In Our Polls
Do you oppose Biden's anti-gun executive orders?
Yes
No
Undecided

Current results
Earlier poll results
4776 people voted

 

SPONSORED LINKS

 
» U.S. Gun Laws
» AmeriPAC
» NoInternetTax
» Gun Show On The Net
» 2nd Amendment Show
» SEMPER FIrearms
» Colt Collectors Assoc.
» Personal Defense Solutions

 

 


Keep and Bear Arms

Search:

Archived Information

Top | Last 30 Days | Search | Add to Archives | Newsletter | Featured Item


To Herr Blagojevich Regarding His Gun Ban Proposal

Originally published on this website July 18, 2000

RE: http://www.msnbc.com/local/WMAQ/24083.asp

Mr. Blagojevich,
Rod.Blagojevich@mail.house.gov

Let me see if I get this straight. Your plan is to ban certain guns because gangs supposedly use and prefer them over other types of guns.

OK. Now, what if that particular model of gun, the gun model that you think, at this point in time, is "gang preferred", is owned by a law-abiding citizen? Is that law-abiding citizen automatically a criminal just because he/she owns a gun that you think they shouldn't? How long will the prison term be for that law-abiding citizen just because they might own a "gang preferred" gun even though they have never been, or never will be, a gang member?

Once you get a ban, if you get such an un-Constitutional ban, on "pocket rocket" type of guns, what type will be next? Will it be shotguns because they have the capability of shooting more than 6 projectiles with every trigger pull, in your opinion? Will it be guns with under a 48 inch barrel because they are too concealable, in your opinion?

Where will it all end? Will it end once and for all with "your type" trying to confiscate ALL guns from "my type"? Isn't that how this country got started? Didn't the Colonists do the same thing to the Brits way back when? Is that your ultimate goal, to start another war? If that is your goal just remember one thing, your group is the "Brits" group and they lost in the end to my group the "Colonists" group!

Why is it that your type of public official always blames the gun and not the person who pulls the trigger? Could it be because the gun can't defend itself and tell you its story? Is it easier for you to go after the gun and not the trigger puller because it's easier for you to hide behind a smoke screen? A smoke screen of trying to get gullible people to believe that you are doing such a good job in your public office that they will vote you in again, all the while you are actually taking their Rights away a chip at a time.

Have a great day.

Dale Nick
djnick101@uswest.net


To Get Your Letters Printed Here
Click here and read submission guidelines.

Printer Version

 QUOTES TO REMEMBER
The "assault weapon" ban didn't stop the [World Trade Center/Pentagon] terrorists, Brady checks didn't stop them, the high capacity magazine ban didn't. Right to Carry would have. If it had saved only one tower and the people in it, it would have been worth it. GUN CONTROL KILLS. — LTC Stasski, 9/11/01

COPYRIGHT POLICY: The posting of copyrighted articles and other content, in whole or in part, is not allowed here. We have made an effort to educate our users about this policy and we are extremely serious about this. Users who are caught violating this rule will be warned and/or banned.
If you are the owner of content that you believe has been posted on this site without your permission, please contact our webmaster by following this link. Please include with your message: (1) the particulars of the infringement, including a description of the content, (2) a link to that content here and (3) information concerning where the content in question was originally posted/published. We will address your complaint as quickly as possible. Thank you.

 
NOTICE:  The information contained in this site is not to be considered as legal advice. In no way are Keep And Bear Arms .com or any of its agents responsible for the actions of our members or site visitors. Also, because this web site is a Free Speech Zone, opinions, ideas, beliefs, suggestions, practices and concepts throughout this site may or may not represent those of Keep And Bear Arms .com. All rights reserved. Articles that are original to this site may be redistributed provided they are left intact and a link to http://www.KeepAndBearArms.com is given. Click here for Contact Information for representatives of KeepAndBearArms.com.

Thawte.com is the leading provider of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites, and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks.

KeepAndBearArms.com, Inc. © 1999-2024, All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy