Keep and Bear Arms
Home Members Login/Join About Us News/Editorials Archives Take Action Your Voice Web Services Free Email
You are 1 of 381 active visitors Saturday, October 01, 2022
Main Email List:

State Email Lists:
Click Here
Join/Renew Online
Join/Renew by Mail
Make a Donation
Magazine Subscriptions
KABA Memorial Fund
Advertise Here
Use KABA Free Email




Keep and Bear Arms - Vote In Our Polls
Do you oppose Biden's anti-gun executive orders?

Current results
Earlier poll results
2508 people voted



» U.S. Gun Laws
» AmeriPAC
» NoInternetTax
» Gun Show On The Net
» 2nd Amendment Show
» SEMPER FIrearms
» Colt Collectors Assoc.
» Personal Defense Solutions



Keep and Bear Arms


Archived Information

Top | Last 30 Days | Search | Add to Archives | Newsletter | Featured Item

The Changing Face of Gun Control

by Erich Pratt
GOA Director of Communications

(July, 2001) -- This month marks an important 25-year milestone for the nation's leading gun control organization.

It was 25 years ago this month that Pete Shields, the founder of Handgun Control, Inc. (HCI), laid out his three-step agenda for banning the private possession of handguns. Yes, he wanted to make handguns totally illegal in this country, including the ones in your home.

Many people erroneously think that Sarah Brady has always been the top boss at HCI. But until his death a few years ago, Pete Shields was the founder and head of the organization which last month changed its name to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

New name. Same goals.

It was in a July 26, 1976 interview with The New Yorker magazine that Pete Shields outlined his very ambitious goals for banning handguns in this country -- a three-step plan that Sarah Brady has followed quite well.

1. "The first problem," Shields said, "is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced and sold in this country."

Sounds logical, doesn't it? If you want to ban handguns, then you've got to slow down the production and sale of all new ones. Well, have Shield's henchmen tried to do this over the last 25 years?

Oh boy, have they ever.

The Brady Bunch has helped many city and local governments to launch frivolous lawsuits against gun makers in an effort to financially cripple them.

Sarah Brady has supported legislation, such as the crime bill that President Clinton signed in 1994, which has helped the feds to shut down more than 200,000 gun dealers nationwide. [KABA NOTE 1]

The Brady Bunch has supported bans on the possession and sale of certain semi-automatic firearms, such as the Feinstein-Schumer ban from 1994 -- a ban covering more than 180 types of firearms. [KABA NOTE 2]

All of this is just the tip of the iceberg, and more examples could be given. But you get the picture. The Brady Bunch has done its best to curtail the sale and production of all kinds of guns. So what's next?

2. According to Brady's boss, Pete Shields: "The second problem is to get handguns registered."

The term registration is taboo these days, since so many voters oppose it as an invasion of privacy. So Brady-backed politicians, such as presidential candidate Al Gore, usually talk about licensing instead -- a true distinction without a difference.

Gore's platform in 2000 called for licensing handgun owners, a position which ultimately cost him the election as pro-gun states such as Florida, Arkansas, West Virginia and Tennessee (his home state) defected to the Republican side of the aisle.

Why, you ask, would the Brady Bunch want to register and license handgun owners?

Well, historically, registration has been the first step towards confiscation. And perhaps that is what Pete Shields had in mind because his push for registration would be helpful in accomplishing his third and final goal.

3. Shields wanted a handgun-free America: "Our ultimate goal . . . is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition -- except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors -- totally illegal."

In other words, he wanted to completely ban the handguns in your home.

When pressed, HCI staff will hesitate to affirm they are still pursuing this goal. But the facts speak loud and clear. Consider the draconian gun ban in Washington, D.C.

Since 1976, authorities in the nation's capital have made it virtually impossible for law-abiding citizens to legally own any kind of firearm. Sarah Brady's organization supports this law.

Oh sure, their spinmeisters like to say they just want to get the guns out of the wrong hands. But what they really mean is that EVERYONE'S hands are the "wrong hands."

I debated an HCI spokesman this year and encouraged his organization to work with us at Gun Owners of America to repeal the DC gun ban since, obviously, the city bans guns from EVERYONE'S hands, not just the "wrong hands" as Sarah Brady likes to say.

No way. Their spokesman would not agree to help us repeal the gun ban.

But why should he? That would take HCI away from the goals Sarah Brady and her organization have worked so hard towards for the past 25 years.

Remember that the next time you hear a reference to the "new" Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. The truth is, their campaign to eradicate "gun violence" starts with you--by controlling the guns in your home.

Erich Pratt is the Director of Communications for Gun Owners of America. GOA is a national gun lobby with over 300,000 members located at 8001 Forbes Place, Springfield, VA 22151 and at on the web.

KABA NOTE 1 -- During the Clinton Administration, the BATF and other assorted Constitution Violaters closed down approximately 74% of the licensed gun dealers in America. It is important for people to understand that the records of all transactions conducted by those gun dealers was handed over to the BATF, assuring the full registration of each and every gun owner.

KABA NOTE 2 -- HCI also supported a complete handgun ban in an Illinois town recently, further identifying their true, original agenda. Their new partner, the so-called "Million Mom March", was also in strong support of that same gun ban.  The ban failed, but they press on.


Printer Version

Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697].

COPYRIGHT POLICY: The posting of copyrighted articles and other content, in whole or in part, is not allowed here. We have made an effort to educate our users about this policy and we are extremely serious about this. Users who are caught violating this rule will be warned and/or banned.
If you are the owner of content that you believe has been posted on this site without your permission, please contact our webmaster by following this link. Please include with your message: (1) the particulars of the infringement, including a description of the content, (2) a link to that content here and (3) information concerning where the content in question was originally posted/published. We will address your complaint as quickly as possible. Thank you.

NOTICE:  The information contained in this site is not to be considered as legal advice. In no way are Keep And Bear Arms .com or any of its agents responsible for the actions of our members or site visitors. Also, because this web site is a Free Speech Zone, opinions, ideas, beliefs, suggestions, practices and concepts throughout this site may or may not represent those of Keep And Bear Arms .com. All rights reserved. Articles that are original to this site may be redistributed provided they are left intact and a link to is given. Click here for Contact Information for representatives of is the leading provider of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites, and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks., Inc. © 1999-2022, All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy