What About the Shooting Sports?
From: AJMD <mailto:jstones@scican.net>
To: sports@nypost.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:36 PM
Subject: What about the shooting sports?
To the Editor, NYPOST.com (permission given to print and include name).
Mark Cannizzaro's recent column <http://www.nypost.com/sports/jets/3790.htm>
castigating Damien Robinson's "distressing" possession of a semiautomatic
rifle in the trunk of his car reflects a profound ignorance of life outside
the city. New Jersey may be all about big-stadium sports, high crime, and stupid
gun laws, but in the rest of the country, the various shooting sports collectively
rival ball games in terms of revenue, and far exceed the ball games in terms
of public participation (as opposed to just sitting and watching at the field
or on television).
Accidental injury and death rates are lower for the shooting
sports than most "ordinary" contact sports, and there are never doped-up
players and fans rioting, raping, or setting cars on fire afterwards.
As far
as the so-called "assault" type weapon, the MAJORITY of rifles used
for sporting purposes are semiautomatic ones, and like the fully automatic "machine
guns" they superficially resemble, were designed to fire relatively low-powered
ammunition, for despite their menacing appearance, the goal for their military
predecessors was to wound, rather than kill (so much for the mantra of assault
rifles being designed to kill people!).
Perhaps Mr. Cannizzaro is unaware that
many families who lack his hoplophobic tendencies actually target shoot and
hunt together, which might explain his shock at the presence of Damien's "wife
and two daughters" being in the car. In fact, many children and petite
women find the light semiautomatic rifle New Jersey calls "assault weapons"
to be far more pleasant to shoot than heavy caliber "hunting" rifles.
For others, they simply have the same allure versus single shot guns that a
Corvette has over a Corvair; better aesthetics, stronger and more durable design,
and...they are just more fun to shoot <urban folks may insert "gasp"
here>.
Of course, I realize that to one who can't imagine why anyone would want to
own or shoot such a gun, none of this information matters. Damien, on the other
hand seems to reflect the thought process of mainstream America; why would anyone
in their right mind imagine that New Jersey, or any other place, would pass
a law BANNING possession of such a gun? Certainly he should not have forgotten
and had it in the trunk of his car, but the fact that it was made into such
an "issue" reflects something far more likely to harm our society
than any mere type of firearm - the irrational fear born of prejudice and ignorance.
Andrew Johnstone, RPh/MD
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws <http://www.dsgl.org>
To Get Your Letters Printed Here
Click here and read submission guidelines.
