Keep and Bear Arms
Home Members Login/Join About Us News/Editorials Archives Take Action Your Voice Web Services Free Email
You are 1 of 356 active visitors Thursday, November 21, 2024
EMAIL NEWS
Main Email List:
Subscribe
Unsubscribe

State Email Lists:
Click Here
SUPPORT KABA
» Join/Renew Online
» Join/Renew by Mail
» Make a Donation
» Magazine Subscriptions
» KABA Memorial Fund
» Advertise Here
» Use KABA Free Email

» JOIN/Renew NOW! «
 
SUPPORT OUR SUPPORTERS

 

YOUR VOTE COUNTS

Keep and Bear Arms - Vote In Our Polls
Do you oppose Biden's anti-gun executive orders?
Yes
No
Undecided

Current results
Earlier poll results
4776 people voted

 

SPONSORED LINKS

 
» U.S. Gun Laws
» AmeriPAC
» NoInternetTax
» Gun Show On The Net
» 2nd Amendment Show
» SEMPER FIrearms
» Colt Collectors Assoc.
» Personal Defense Solutions

 

 


Keep and Bear Arms

Search:

Archived Information

Top | Last 30 Days | Search | Add to Archives | Newsletter | Featured Item


The Libertarian Second Amendment Caucus
By L. Neil Smith
lneil@ezlink.com

People ask me constantly about the Libertarian Second Amendment Caucus: what is it; what is it for; is it still alive; how can they join.

The LSAC is an organization I created a few years ago because of the failure of both the Libertarian Party and the National Rifle Association to effectively address government, mass-media, and pressure-group assaults on the individual right to own and carry weapons.

The LSAC, as I conceived it, has no "rank-and-file" membership. Its goal is to generate a political climate favorable to stringent enforcement of the Bill of Rights, primarily by informing gun owners about Libertarianism, while informing Libertarians on Second Amendment issues. The plan is to recruit an LSAC "coordinator" in every county and every state, as well as every riding and every province, in North America.

The LSAC is principle-driven, struggling for what we all know to be right, rather than what some "expert" tells us is "possible". (What's right becomes impossible only when we give up before the struggle even commences.) Those who wish to become LSAC coordinators must be willing to embrace the Non-Aggression Pledge in its most restrictive form; as one coordinator recently pointed out, this is not only a moral thing to do, but when responsibility for mass killings is being slung around so casually, it may prove highly pragmatic, as well.

What's the pledge? A Libertarian is a person who believes that no one has a right under any circumstances to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. This is all Libertarianism consists of, no more, no less. Those who act consistently with this principle are Libertarians whether they realize it or not (and are the sort I want for the LSAC). Those who fail to act consistently with it are not Libertarians, no matter what they may claim.

LSAC coordinators must also agree with the LSAC Statement of Principles ...

Libertarian Second Amendment Caucus
Statement of Principles

Every man, woman, and responsible child has a natural, fundamental, and inalienable human, individual, civil, and Constitutional right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- handgun, shotgun, rifle, machinegun, anything -- any time, anywhere, without asking anyone's permission.
-- L. Neil Smith, WeaponsCon I
Atlanta, GA, November, 1987

The Libertarian Second Amendment Caucus opposes all proposed and pending victim-disarmament laws -- commonly but improperly known as "gun control" -- and, given the political power, will:

1) repeal more than 20,000 victim-disarmament laws already on the books (none of which is Constitutional or consistent with the concept of individual or human rights) and abolish all agencies, at every level of government, responsible for enforcing them;

2) decriminalize concealed weapons carry and the act of self-defense;

3) pardon and provide restitution to anyone ever harmed or even inconvenienced by victim-disarmament laws;

4) arrest, convict, fine, and imprison any public official who ever enacted or enforced victim-disarmament laws; and

5) where a violation of individual or Constitutional rights has resulted in a fatality, impose the maximum penalty on all such public officials.

====

LSAC coordinators must belong at some level to the Libertarian Party. Because the national LP currently fails to live up to ordinary standards of courage, decency, or competence (let alone the standards required by the LSAC) I recommend that they join their state LP. If it suffers the same malaise as the national LP, look into absentee membership in the Arizona LP by contacting ALP Chairman Mike Dugger cartero@netwrk.com.

LSAC coordinators must also be gun owners and belong to at least one organization like the NRA, Gun Owners of America, the Second Amendment Foundation, Citizens' Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, or Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership. None of these groups is perfect (although JPFO comes close); if they were, there'd have been no need for the LSAC. The NRA, in particular, with its suicidal campaign for national licensing, has transformed itself into the world's largest gun control lobby. Think of them as vehicles for persuading others to adopt a more consistent and effective view, a Libertarian view, on Second Amendment issues. (Some LSAC coordinators maintain a similar connection with the American Civil Liberties Union.)

In this context, if you'd like to be more than another haranguing voice at a meeting nobody really wants to attend, consider joining a local club and participating in something like competition or range maintenence. When words fail, your willingness to work hard or an ability to shoot straight can be more persuasive than any political lecture.

Finally, LSAC coordinators must be cybernetically capable -- at least able to send and receive e-mail, as that's the principal means by which we communicate among ourselves. If they also happen to be communicators in other media -- writers or speakers -- so much the better.

The LSAC is a political and cultural organization, not a militia. Due to length limitations, I'll leave the details of "Putting the LSAC to Work" for a future article. For now, just consider a couple of examples.

Suppose, in response to some anti-gun propaganda, an advertiser -- not the network; they're used to this stuff -- received apparently uncoordinated calls and letters from each of 50 states, 3088 counties, 10 provinces, and I don't know how many ridings in North America. Or a newspaper got equally widespread responses in praise of a pro-gun article. Or suppose a Senator received -- over a six month period -- demands from every part of the country that a certain federal judge be impeached.

Or imagine the effect some 3000 hard-line delegates might have on a convention of the LP, the NRA, the ACLU, or even the Republican Party.

The mere ubiquity of the LSAC may be enough to change things. If everywhere the enemies of liberty go, everywhere they look, in every state, country, province, and riding, in every newspaper and magazine, on every radio station, and eventually every TV channel, the LSAC is there to name them for the vicious liars they've always been and the murderous thugs they've become, they may finally come to understand that we gun owners are no longer a soft political target and easy prey.

If you qualify as an LSAC coordinator, write to me. We can no longer count on the LP or the NRA to get us out of the mess they created.


Permission to redistribute this article is herewith granted by the author -- provided that it is reproduced unedited, in its entirety, and appropriate credit given.


Order my books at: http://www.webleyweb.com/lneil/lnsbooks.html

My home on the web, The Webley Page: www.webleyweb.com/lneil/

My e-zine The Libertarian Enterprise: www.webleyweb.com/tle/

Printer Version

 QUOTES TO REMEMBER
Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836

COPYRIGHT POLICY: The posting of copyrighted articles and other content, in whole or in part, is not allowed here. We have made an effort to educate our users about this policy and we are extremely serious about this. Users who are caught violating this rule will be warned and/or banned.
If you are the owner of content that you believe has been posted on this site without your permission, please contact our webmaster by following this link. Please include with your message: (1) the particulars of the infringement, including a description of the content, (2) a link to that content here and (3) information concerning where the content in question was originally posted/published. We will address your complaint as quickly as possible. Thank you.

 
NOTICE:  The information contained in this site is not to be considered as legal advice. In no way are Keep And Bear Arms .com or any of its agents responsible for the actions of our members or site visitors. Also, because this web site is a Free Speech Zone, opinions, ideas, beliefs, suggestions, practices and concepts throughout this site may or may not represent those of Keep And Bear Arms .com. All rights reserved. Articles that are original to this site may be redistributed provided they are left intact and a link to http://www.KeepAndBearArms.com is given. Click here for Contact Information for representatives of KeepAndBearArms.com.

Thawte.com is the leading provider of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites, and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks.

KeepAndBearArms.com, Inc. © 1999-2024, All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy