|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WI: How to deal with gun violence? Ban guns
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Paul Fanlund’s column on gun control omits the best opinion for dealing with handguns: Ban them. Except for police and foresters, they are useless, unnecessary and dangerous. After coming to this conclusion myself, I did a little research and found a book that agrees with that position. “Every Handgun Is Pointed at You,” by Josh Sugarmann, executive director of The Violence Policy Institute, published in 2001. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/18/2015)
|
| Don't these jackwagons ever get tired of spouting their nonsense in the face of absolute constitutional protections? |
| Comment by:
lostone1413
(7/19/2015)
|
| your more then welcome to come and try to take my guns lol |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
