|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
OH: Gov. Mike DeWine Signs Bill Expanding 'Stand your ground' Policy
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Gov. Mike DeWine Monday signed into law a controversial bill that changes Ohio's "stand your ground" policy, expanding the use of firearms in self-defense anywhere someone has the right to be, not just in one's home or vehicle. Senate Bill 175, sponsored by Republican State Senator Tim Schaffer, amends Ohio law to expand locations in which a person has no duty to retreat before using a firearm in defense. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/5/2021)
|
| Well, well. Even a blind RINO gets it, apparently. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/5/2021)
|
No comments section in the article, and not enough room here.
Here's a link to my categorical response, posted at RightMindsForum:
http://www.rightmindsforum.com/cgi-bin/anyboard.cgi/rightminds?cmd=get&cG=332363539313&zu=333236353839&v=2&gV=0&p= |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
