|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(1/30/2019)
|
Our rights are protected by the Constitution and they can’t be bargained away or negotiated.
Internal spying and surveillance is one of the signs of the beginning of the end for Freedom.
Proposals for increased powers so they can engage in repressive actions against views or certain behaviors could be a sure warning sign on the road to tyranny. Buckle up..... |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(1/30/2019)
|
What you post goes out there forever. Anyone can read what is posted on this site anytime.
If you don't want it blasted out there to three hundred million readers, some of whom are LEOs, don't put it on the 'net. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
