
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
3 Guns, Credentials Stolen from Parked FBI Vehicle in Bay Area
Submitted by:
jac
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Three guns and several other items were stolen Friday morning from a "secured FBI vehicle" that was parked in a Bay Area neighborhood.
The FBI said the theft happened in a residential neighborhood in Benicia. Thieves stole:
- Glock 22 .40 caliber handgun - Glock 27 .40 caliber handgun - Springfield 1911a .45 caliber handgun - FBI badge and credentials - Other FBI property
In two recent thefts, firearms stolen from law enforcement agents' vehicles were later used in fatal slayings.
Submitters note: This is how criminals get guns. They don't get them from gun shows. |
Comment by:
Uncommon1
(2/2/2016)
|
You can be sure that those guns won't be used in any improper means, because most of the Bay Area is pretty much gun free, and anyone who steals guns would in all likelihood be afraid to use them in a crime. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|