|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(11/2/2015)
|
Good riddance.
And the lawyers and judges can't put the criminal back on the street to commit countless additional crimes. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(11/2/2015)
|
Why do these nitwits need to "investigate" this any further than the facial evidence?
The guy presented a gun and committed an armed robbery. He was in the process of forcing a female into the back room. The CCW guy reacted appropriately, and effectively. **** DOA.
WTF is to INVESTIGATE?
Give the guy a medal, and the girl's home phone number. [kidding]
Sheesh. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
