|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NJ: Chris Christie’s potential gun control bind
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s administration is proposing stricter rules for gun dealers – a move that is expected to be closely watched as Christie considers jumping into the 2016 GOP presidential contest.
The proposals were put forth by the state police department, and have been approved by acting state Attorney General John J. Hoffman. The rules would affect the approximately 377 licensed retail and registered wholesale gun dealers and manufacturers in the state. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(1/9/2015)
|
As a NJ resident, (and registered Republican) I will unequivocally state IMO Governor Christie is as crass and opportunistic as any politician that's ever been our misfortune to endure. And we've had/have a great many ! He jumped on the "anti-gun bandwagon" until hundreds of gun owners packed hearings in Trenton to express their displeasure with a litany of his proposed changes to NJ gun law. Then he vetoed the most unpopular with some glib excuses.
But NJ is "hoplophobe central" and it, (and NJ politician's careers) pivot on the Bergen, Passaic, Essex, Hudson, Somerset, Middlesex, Mercer axis. And this axis swings presidential elections. Christie is as venal, opportunistic and mendacious as any NJ governor since Woodrow Wilson. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
