|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
packing in va
(3/7/2019)
|
| So it is better that people be shot by the twos and threes in cities like Chicago? |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(3/7/2019)
|
Seems to me most "mass shootings" are done with guns the perp already owns, so I doubt gun control laws of any type would help.
I think this study is rigged. |
| Comment by:
jac
(3/7/2019)
|
We would have fewer mass shootings if we got rid of victim disarmament zones.
That won't happen because the gun control liberals want more mass shootings to further their agenda of imposing more restrictions on law abiding gun owners. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
