|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Children Are Dying Because Of Americans' Denial About Guns
Submitted by:
Conn Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Today, 19 children will die or receive emergency treatment for a gunshot wound in the U.S. And tomorrow, another 19 will. And then another 19 the next day. In fact, 91% of all children who die from firearms in high-income countries across the world come from the United States, and guns are the third leading cause of death for all children between ages 1 and 17. Those are a handful of the sobering statistics reported in a new study on gun violence in Pediatrics. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(6/20/2017)
|
| If the author would do real research on other countries, there might a reason to debate her on it. The true tie braker on firearm deaths of our youth, is EDUCATION on firearms, if the parents and schools refuse to educate our children, this will CONTINUE to happen, it is the parents fault !!! |
| Comment by:
shootergdv
(6/20/2017)
|
| And how many of these were gang members ? |
| Comment by:
lbauer
(6/20/2017)
|
| Age appropriate gun safety and handling instruction at every level of American education k through 12 would eliminate most accidental child gun injuries. But the liberal mind set is that teaching safe sex and birth control is just fine while we absolutely cannot even mention guns. That would have terrible negative influence on young minds you know. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/20/2017)
|
| Nothey'renot. Quitlyin'. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
