|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NJ: There's no such thing as a toy gun
Submitted by:
John Donovan
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
... "I have a problem with recreational shooting; I have a bigger problem with allowing anyone -- especially minors -- access to weapons. Rather than reclassify air pistols as something less than a firearm, the state should be requiring that purchasers have permits. ..." ...
"There are far too many guns on the streets. We do not need loopholes allowing plastic weapons to proliferate." ...
"Courts will determine whether Morris is guilty, but county governments across the state should have uniform enforcement policies on air pistols. If it looks like a firearm, and it fires a projectile, it's a firearm." ...
-------
Submitter's note: Mr. Doblin can be reached at doblin@northjersey.com "Your Views" letters to The Record can be sent to LettersToTheEditor@northjersey.com |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
