|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(6/1/2015)
|
That settles it.
Queen Elizabeth is the incarnate "Red Queen". |
| Comment by:
Mike the Limey
(6/1/2015)
|
The Queen has sod all to do with it, as the Monarchy these days is purely symbolic & a money making attractor of foreign tourists.
Take what the NRA says in this article with a large pinch of salt, as it's full of omissions, inaccuracies & use of information out of context.
Put it this way: If I suffer a home invasion right now & one of those involved comes at me with a hammer or knife, then he'll be met with a 130gr Sierra Game King & I will assuredly NOT be going to jail for doing so.
The right to self defence is alive & well in the UK:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2198753/Leicestershire-burglar-shooting-No-charges-couple-shot-burglers-targeted-isolated-cottage.html |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
